On Mon, Mar 11, 2019 at 5:19 PM Curtis <serverascode@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> On Sun, Mar 10, 2019 at 11:54 AM Victor Rodriguez <vm.rod25@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi team
>>
>> After some research on the topic and the great help from Numan's team,
>> I came into this great presentation about how to use OPNFV for
>> performance metrics (video available at [0]):
>>
>> https://www.openstack.org/assets/presentation-media/OpenStack-Summit-Vancouver-OPNFV-Test-tools-2.pdf
>>
>> It was presented on May 2018 OpenStack Summit, Here is described
>> Yardstick Test Case for performance measurement, They do have a very
>> good wiki on how to do :
>>
>> Installation and run:
>> http://artifacts.opnfv.org/yardstick/colorado/2.0/docs/userguide/index.html#document-07-installation
>>
>> Description of every test case :
>> https://docs.opnfv.org/en/stable-fraser/submodules/yardstick/docs/testing/user/userguide/15-list-of-tcs.html
>>
>> After a quick view, Yardstick has the capability to measure
>> performance in 3 sections:
>>
>> * Compute
>> * Storage
>> * Network
>>
>> With multiple tests cases for each one ( slide 13 of presentation )
>>
>> This is a simple update to keep the community informed about the
>> progress on this topic, if someone has any feedback, please let me
>> know.
>
>
> I haven't used Yardstick, but it sounds like a step in the right direction. Perhaps we can find things to push back upstream to OPNFV.
>
> What I'm hoping is that we can use the Packet.com resources that should be available soon to run automated performance tests and then publish the results on a continual basis. I'm definitely interested in helping out. :)
>
> Thanks,
> Curtis
>
Thanks a lot Curtis, CI/CD definitely is the next step ones I could
enable this from the developer perspective. My goal is to provide a
simple tutorial/script to run a test on a pre-configured and working
STX cloud system that developers could use to measure their changes.
Once I have this and make a demo I will ping you to try in your dev
machine and then TSC can decide to deploy this on Packet. The good
thing about Yardstick is that it has a connection to grafana so we
don't have to worry about a dashboard : ) .
The concern that I have (that I would like input from the TSC) is how
to define what configuration we want to use on Packet as baseline
configuration, this is important because a change in the configuration
might represent a huge change in performance results.
Also, are we ok
to compare the STX results against regular OpenStack
Performanceomrance numbers is always hard to handle since they are
very senitive. I would like to bring this topic to the TSC or comunity
meeting so we can tak e a decision as comunity. My work might finish
when we could have a way to get the numbers, publication, and track of
them might be a decision out of my scope.
I will keep you posted
Regards
>
>>
>>
>> Numan/ Peng thanks a lot for the document, after reading I realize it
>> is focused on Tempest ( which is used by OPNFV but as part of
>> Functest, which is the test framework provided to answer the question:
>> Does my infrastructure simply work as expected?.
>>
>> Regards
>>
>> BTW, sorry for the long delay of an update for this topic
>>
>> Victor Rodriguez
>>
>> [0] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RxMbF8ILl-M
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Starlingx-discuss mailing list
>> Starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io
>> http://lists.starlingx.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/starlingx-discuss
>
>
>
> --
> Blog: serverascode.com