Hi Ghada/Matt, NIC driver should be okay given IGB (Intel I210) is already there. To support TSN, we still need some kernel features, for example, * Qdisc TAPRIO: implemented TSN protocol 802.1Qbv and was introduced in Linux 4.20 * Qdisc CBS: implemented 802.1Qav and was introduced in Linux 4.15 * probably other features like AF_XDP socket family which was introduced in Linux 4.18. For the feature of " TSN support in Kata", since Kata container has its own kernel, there is not hard dependency with CentOS 8 upgrade task. Thanks. Yi -----Original Message----- From: Khalil, Ghada <Ghada.Khalil@windriver.com> Sent: Friday, February 21, 2020 9:15 AM To: starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] Minutes: StarlingX Networking Meeting - 02/20 Meeting minutes/agenda are captured at: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/stx-networking Team Introductions (for Romania team) - Nikoli Jascanu: Leader of StarlingX Intel validation team in Europe - Team size is 10 people - 7 in Romania + 3 in Germany - Mihail-Laurentiu Trica: Ramping up in general on StarlingX; not particularly focused on networking at this time - Chris Winnicki: WR StarlingX Test team - Matt Peters: StarlingX Networking Technical Lead - Steve Webster: StarlingX WR Networking team - Joseph Richard: StarlingX WR Networking team - Sabeel Ansari: StarlingX WR Networking team - new to the team - Yi Wang: StarlingX Intel team stx.4.0 Features - TSN support in Kata - Prime: Shuicheng - Status: Not Started - Question from Matt: Is there a hard dependency on the 4.19 / CentOS 8 kernel? Is there a possibility to break this dependency? - Are there specific features of the newer kernel that is required? - Ghada to follow up with Shuicheng & Yong - IPv6 PXE boot network support - Prime: Kunpeng Zhang - 99cloud - Status: Not Started - Ghada to reach out to him - OVS-DPDK Containerization - Question from Matt: Was there any StarlingX work done on this feature before it was put on hold? - What are the plans for the current reviews posted in other projects? Are they being abandoned or transitioned to a new owner? - Current reviews: - starlingx/openstack-armada-app: https://review.opendev.org/#/c/696437/ - starlingx/config: https://review.opendev.org/#/c/694188 - openstack/openstack-armada-app: https://review.opendev.org/#/c/701676/ - Ghada to follow up with Huifeng stx.4.0 Bugs - Total: 4 - https://bugs.launchpad.net/starlingx/+bug/1833463 -- armada-manifest upload failed when configuring bond with OVS container (vswitch-type=none) - Needs to be re-assigned. Action with Yong. Work is related to openstack-helm - https://bugs.launchpad.net/starlingx/+bug/1850438 -- The sriov device plugin pod may start before it's config manifest is written - Steve. On hold. This is a larger scope item. Should re-gate? - https://bugs.launchpad.net/starlingx/+bug/1855191 - Unable to modify interface to use static IP - Thomas. Review in progress - https://bugs.launchpad.net/starlingx/+bug/1856587 - Traceback in unlock host when configuring pci-passthrough interfaces and sriovdp label enabled - Thomas. Review in progress stx.3.0 Bugs - Total: 1 - https://bugs.launchpad.net/starlingx/+bug/1821026 -- Containers: Resolving hostname fails within nova containers leading to config_drive VM migration failures - This is a valid issue and we want to continue working on it. There is a review in progress, but there are issues with testing. - Is Zhipeng taking this over? Recent emails sent from Weifei stx.2.0 Bugs - Total: 2 - https://bugs.launchpad.net/starlingx/+bug/1849655 -- StarlingX R2 duplex: VM not getting IP assigned to the vlan network when re-spawned on controller-0 after shutting down controller-1 - Lowering the priority as this appears to be a setup issue, not a software issue - https://bugs.launchpad.net/starlingx/+bug/1839181 -- Platform CPU threshold exceeded in compute after lock/unlock a different compute host (Storage System) - Recently re-opened. Not enough data (reference to duplicate LP which also has no data). Following up with the reporter. Low Priority Bugs - Total: 8 _______________________________________________ Starlingx-discuss mailing list Starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io http://lists.starlingx.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/starlingx-discuss