Yes,

 

[wrsroot@controller-0 ~(keystone_admin)]$ system host-list | grep "controller-1"

| 4  | controller-1 | controller  | locked         | disabled    | online       |

 

Tested against the last ISO too: stx-2018-10-01-156.iso

 

Regards.

Juan Carlos Alonso

 

From: Rowsell, Brent [mailto:Brent.Rowsell@windriver.com]
Sent: Saturday, September 29, 2018 9:40 AM
To: Alonso, Juan Carlos <juan.carlos.alonso@intel.com>; starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io
Subject: RE: There are not network interfaces in controller-1

 

 

Did controller-1 go online ?

 

Brent

 

From: Alonso, Juan Carlos [mailto:juan.carlos.alonso@intel.com]
Sent: Friday, September 28, 2018 10:17 PM
To: starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io
Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] There are not network interfaces in controller-1

 

Hi,

 

Was there a change on how to create or provision network interfaces for controllers?

 

When Controller-1 was installed and try to provision it, there is not output for “system host-if-list –a controller-1”, for controller-0 there is.

So, if controller-1 is not full provisioned it cannot ‘unlock’ and cannot be used.

 

I followed steps in Wiki for Virtual multinode controller storage.

https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/StarlingX/Installation_Guide_Virtual_Environment/Controller_Storage

Execute against ISO: stx-2018-09-28-148.iso

 

Regards.

Juan Carlos Alonso