Moving to 7.5 should be considered as part of the upcoming release, but retirement of existing patches needs to be part of that plan. Brent From: Hu, Yong [mailto:yong.hu@intel.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 18, 2018 8:48 PM To: Little, Scott <Scott.Little@windriver.com>; starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io Subject: Re: [Starlingx-discuss] StarlingX.repo using CentOS 7.3 binary repos instead of 7.4? What if we move to the latest 7.5 1804? Do you see any drawbacks or hard dependencies still on old packages? Regards, Yong From: Scott Little <scott.little@windriver.com<mailto:scott.little@windriver.com>> Date: Wednesday, 18 July 2018 at 11:17 PM To: "starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io<mailto:starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io>" <starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io<mailto:starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io>> Subject: Re: [Starlingx-discuss] StarlingX.repo using CentOS 7.3 binary repos instead of 7.4? StarlingX should be based on Centos 7.4 for the vast majority of packages. I think there are a dozen that have made the move to 7.5. There are also a few that we blacklisted and are pulling from earlier releases. I'll attach my black_list notes as they exist today. I'll have to audit them to make sure my notes are up to date. Scott On 18-07-18 10:47 AM, Penney, Don wrote: Hi all, The StarlingX.repo file in stx-tools has all the CentOS 7.4.1708 binary repos disabled and is instead using 7.3.1611. This would likely explain why some of the specified RPMs cannot be downloaded via yum, as they were upversioned in 7.4. Was this done for a particular reason, or is it a configuration error? Don Penney, Developer, Wind River _______________________________________________ Starlingx-discuss mailing list Starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io<mailto:Starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io> http://lists.starlingx.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/starlingx-discuss