Of course, it could be optional Armada application in the StralingX repo to make things easy. But better yet I would contribute into EdgeX Foundry directly and create helm charts there. Regards, Alex -----Original Message----- From: Hu, Yong [mailto:yong.hu@intel.com] Sent: Tuesday, 09 July, 2019 11:53 To: Kozyrev, Alexander (Alex); Zvonar, Bill; Cordoba Malibran, Erich; Jones, Bruce E; starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io Subject: Re: [Starlingx-discuss] EdgeX deeper integration? Alex, About "official EdgeX application", did you mean an Armada application with helm charts in the context of StarlingX? If so, I think it's worth making it as an "optional" application and sysadmin can install/apply it when needed. On 09/07/2019, 5:04 AM, "Kozyrev, Alexander (Alex)" <Alex.Kozyrev@windriver.com> wrote: StarlingX Akraino blueprint is focused on validation of EdgeX Foundry services running on StralingX far edge cluster by providing an integration CI/CD pipeline. And we definitely need some improvements in our current implementation. As you can see from our test_kube_edgex_services.py test script I used not really mature open-source project for EdgeX on Kubernetes [0] Creation of official EdgeX application would benefit to all involved projects. [0] https://github.com/rohitsardesai83/edgex-on-kubernetes -----Original Message----- From: Zvonar, Bill [mailto:Bill.Zvonar@windriver.com] Sent: Friday, 28 June, 2019 09:02 To: Cordoba Malibran, Erich; Jones, Bruce E; starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io Subject: Re: [Starlingx-discuss] EdgeX deeper integration? There's definitely interest from the Akraino/StarlingX perspective. For those that aren't aware, the EdgeX Foundry application is part of Akraino's StarlingX blueprint [0]. As plans unfold for the next release of Akraino, we will be happy to have contributions in this area. [0] https://wiki.akraino.org/display/AK/StarlingX+Far+Edge+Distributed+Cloud -----Original Message----- From: Cordoba Malibran, Erich <erich.cordoba.malibran@intel.com> Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2019 5:01 PM To: Jones, Bruce E <bruce.e.jones@intel.com>; starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io Subject: Re: [Starlingx-discuss] EdgeX deeper integration? Actually, in the ongoing review for the pytest framework there is this setup of EdgeX in k8s. https://review.opendev.org/#/c/665419/3/automated-pytest-suite/testcases/fun... This could be a good start point to create an EdgeX application. -Erich On Thu, 2019-06-27 at 19:54 +0000, Jones, Bruce E wrote: > We had an internal discussion today about EdgeX. We are seeing signs > of it increasing in use and importance in the Edge ecosystem. > > It is fairly straightforward to build and run an EdgeX application > under StarlingX today. We had it running in the Intel booth at the > Denver Summit. > > My question for the community is this: Is there value or interest in > making EdgeX apps even easier to run within StarlingX? For example, > we could create an EdgeX application in StarlingX and allow users to > apply it to the system, to allow the EdgeX services to run and be > managed by StarlingX. This would add some ease of use benefits for > EdgeX users while also putting us in the position of maintaining an up > to date version of EdgeX. > > Is this something we should work on as a community? > > brucej > > > > _______________________________________________ > Starlingx-discuss mailing list > Starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io > http://lists.starlingx.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/starlingx-discuss _______________________________________________ Starlingx-discuss mailing list Starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io http://lists.starlingx.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/starlingx-discuss _______________________________________________ Starlingx-discuss mailing list Starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io http://lists.starlingx.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/starlingx-discuss _______________________________________________ Starlingx-discuss mailing list Starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io http://lists.starlingx.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/starlingx-discuss