On Sun, Mar 10, 2019 at 11:54 AM Victor Rodriguez <vm.rod25@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi team
After some research on the topic and the great help from Numan's team, I came into this great presentation about how to use OPNFV for performance metrics (video available at [0]):
https://www.openstack.org/assets/presentation-media/OpenStack-Summit-Vancouv...
It was presented on May 2018 OpenStack Summit, Here is described Yardstick Test Case for performance measurement, They do have a very good wiki on how to do :
Installation and run:
http://artifacts.opnfv.org/yardstick/colorado/2.0/docs/userguide/index.html#...
Description of every test case :
https://docs.opnfv.org/en/stable-fraser/submodules/yardstick/docs/testing/us...
After a quick view, Yardstick has the capability to measure performance in 3 sections:
* Compute * Storage * Network
With multiple tests cases for each one ( slide 13 of presentation )
This is a simple update to keep the community informed about the progress on this topic, if someone has any feedback, please let me know.
I haven't used Yardstick, but it sounds like a step in the right direction. Perhaps we can find things to push back upstream to OPNFV. What I'm hoping is that we can use the Packet.com resources that should be available soon to run automated performance tests and then publish the results on a continual basis. I'm definitely interested in helping out. :) Thanks, Curtis
Numan/ Peng thanks a lot for the document, after reading I realize it is focused on Tempest ( which is used by OPNFV but as part of Functest, which is the test framework provided to answer the question: Does my infrastructure simply work as expected?.
Regards
BTW, sorry for the long delay of an update for this topic
Victor Rodriguez
[0] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RxMbF8ILl-M
_______________________________________________ Starlingx-discuss mailing list Starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io http://lists.starlingx.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/starlingx-discuss
-- Blog: serverascode.com