On 5/29/19 4:32 PM, Penney, Don wrote:
The install_state progress notifications are part of the StarlingX installer customizations to Anaconda. If you have the stock CentOS installer, you won't get these notifications. Likewise, this would likely explain issue #1.
Yuppers, I have re-built my installer images and ISO, and seem to have fixed the eth interface issue and the install_state issue. I have run through the Setup/Provisioning and it's currently working on Sanity, but all passing green so far. I could log into the controller-1 with sysadmin and the correctly changed password so that control is working. Finally some positive news! Sau!
-----Original Message----- From: Saul Wold [mailto:sgw@linux.intel.com] Sent: Wednesday, May 29, 2019 7:11 PM To: starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io Subject: Re: [Starlingx-discuss] wrsroot -> sysadmin rebased reviews
On 5/29/19 1:53 PM, Perez Carranza, Jose wrote:
Hi
I used the ISO provided by Saul and below are some findings on virtual environment.
1. Interfaces are named eth0 and eth1 instead of eth1000 and eth1001, this is breaking our automation flow I think this might be because I have an older installer, thoughts?
I am rebuilding the iso with updated installer files (squashfs.img, initrd.img and vmlinuz).
2. it never updates the `install_state` it always stays in `None` as our automation uses that value to monitor the installation progress it also fails Not sure how this one can be connected to wrsroot / sysadmin, if someone can point me a to a little further details of where this state change happens, I can take a look further into it. Maybe a permissions issue?
Sau!
3. Hacking those 2 issues I was able to complete deployment and execute Sanity (using config_controller --force) without significant problems (I saw some issues but are related to my host machine resources rather than the functionality)
Note: Issues 1 and 2 were not observed on any other ISOs recently validated.
Regards, José
-----Original Message----- From: Saul Wold [mailto:sgw@linux.intel.com] Sent: Wednesday, May 29, 2019 1:03 PM To: starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] wrsroot -> sysadmin rebased reviews
Folks,
I pushed the rebased reviews for the username change to this set of 5 repos:
https://review.opendev.org/#/q/topic:wrsroot
I have created an ISO that the Intel team is testing with, if other members can build an iso with an updated manifest to include these changes and test.
Thanks Sau!
_______________________________________________ Starlingx-discuss mailing list Starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io http://lists.starlingx.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/starlingx-discuss
Starlingx-discuss mailing list Starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io http://lists.starlingx.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/starlingx-discuss
_______________________________________________ Starlingx-discuss mailing list Starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io http://lists.starlingx.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/starlingx-discuss