Thank you, Saul - it's might be possible that the ISO is not consistent with the patch that supposed to be built in. It will be very valuable that Ada continue the testing of the re-built image with the patch cherry-pick in. Thx. - cindy -----Original Message----- From: Saul Wold [mailto:sgw@linux.intel.com] Sent: Sunday, February 10, 2019 12:14 AM To: starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io Subject: Re: [Starlingx-discuss] CentOS7.6 testing status - blocked Cindy, I asked Ada to rebuild and re-test based on the patch that Martin provided before CNY, the 20190202 ISO failed the Duplex testing, but when manually patched succeeded. I wondered if the 20190202 ISO was not rebuilt correctly. This is why I have not merged Martin's patch yet, I did not find out about this failure mode until Thursday. They started that build on Friday and should be able to test it on Monday. If your team is back already and can also rebuild with the patch included and confirm it's correct, then we can work to unblock testing of CentOS-76 work. Sau! On 2/8/19 6:18 PM, Liu, Yang wrote:
Correct.
BR,
Yang
*From:*Xie, Cindy [mailto:cindy.xie@intel.com] *Sent:* February-08-19 8:28 PM *To:* Liu, Yang; starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io *Subject:* RE: CentOS7.6 testing status - blocked
Hi, Yang,
Thanks for the report.
Are the “two node system” below referring to Duplex? Just want to confirm because #1814360 we have a patch pending and we do want to ensure it works on Duplex as well.
Th.x - cindy
*From:* Liu, Yang [mailto:yang.liu@windriver.com] *Sent:* Saturday, February 9, 2019 2:09 AM *To:* starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io *Subject:* [Starlingx-discuss] CentOS7.6 testing status - blocked
Hi folks,
Here’s an update for CentOS7.6 testing.
We are currently blocked due to pxeboot from controller-0 does not work for EFI. (#1814360)
We will continue after that issue is resolved.
System
NICs
Mgmt;infra;data
Special Configs
Test coverage after Install and Config
Status/Issues
Dedicated storage
X540-AT2; X540-AT2; fortville
IPv6
Sanity, nova
Completed. New issues logged.
#1814336 CentOS7.6: Unable to launch vm directly from virsh <https://bugs.launchpad.net/starlingx/+bug/1814336>
#1814335 CentOS7.6: Unable to launch vm with UEFI boot <https://bugs.launchpad.net/starlingx/+bug/1814335>
One node system
none; none; X522/X577-AT
Sanity, basic regression
Completed. Passed.
Two node system
fortville; fortville; fortville
tboot, tpm, https,
extended security profile
Sanity, security
Blocked by #1814360
Multi-node system
BCM5720; Niantic; Niantic
Sriov(niantic),pcipt(niantic)
Sanity, networking
Completed. Passed.
Two node system
Fortville; none; Fortville
Low latency, UEFI
Sanity, basic regression, cyclictest
Blocked by #1814360
Two node system
Fortville; none; Fortville
Secure boot
Sanity, security
Blocked by #1814360
Multi-node system
I350; Niantic/cx3; cx3
Pxeboot script
Sanity
Completed. Passed.
Only compute-0 was used, since compute-1 has CX3 data nic.
??
CX4 on infra or mgmt, but NOT data
Won’t test. We don’t have a system have required nics.
BR,
yang
_______________________________________________ Starlingx-discuss mailing list Starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io http://lists.starlingx.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/starlingx-discuss
_______________________________________________ Starlingx-discuss mailing list Starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io http://lists.starlingx.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/starlingx-discuss