Re: [Starlingx-discuss] Re-branding wrsroot proposal
sysadmin +1 -----Original Message----- From: Xie, Cindy [mailto:cindy.xie@intel.com] Sent: May 7, 2019 10:42 To: Bujold, Kristine <Kristine.Bujold@windriver.com>; Penney, Don <Don.Penney@windriver.com>; Saul Wold <sgw@linux.intel.com>; starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io Subject: Re: [Starlingx-discuss] Re-branding wrsroot proposal Sysadmin + 1, easier to spell then deployadmin. -----Original Message----- From: Bujold, Kristine [mailto:Kristine.Bujold@windriver.com] Sent: Tuesday, May 7, 2019 10:41 PM To: Penney, Don <Don.Penney@windriver.com>; Saul Wold <sgw@linux.intel.com>; starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io Subject: Re: [Starlingx-discuss] Re-branding wrsroot proposal sysadmin +1 -----Original Message----- From: Penney, Don [mailto:Don.Penney@windriver.com] Sent: Tuesday, May 7, 2019 10:38 AM To: Saul Wold <sgw@linux.intel.com>; starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io Subject: Re: [Starlingx-discuss] Re-branding wrsroot proposal 3 characters ;) -----Original Message----- From: Saul Wold [mailto:sgw@linux.intel.com] Sent: Tuesday, May 07, 2019 10:36 AM To: starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io Subject: Re: [Starlingx-discuss] Re-branding wrsroot proposal On 5/7/19 6:51 AM, Penney, Don wrote:
I'd vote -1 on deployadmin based on length alone. It would be nice to keep it short... less typing :)
It's only 2 characters longer than sysadmin and it is descriptive of the account. Just saying, no vote yet from me.. Sau!
_______________________________________________ Starlingx-discuss mailing list Starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io http://lists.starlingx.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/starlingx-discuss _______________________________________________ Starlingx-discuss mailing list Starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io http://lists.starlingx.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/starlingx-discuss _______________________________________________ Starlingx-discuss mailing list Starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io http://lists.starlingx.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/starlingx-discuss _______________________________________________ Starlingx-discuss mailing list Starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io http://lists.starlingx.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/starlingx-discuss ------------------------------ Message: 2 Date: Tue, 7 May 2019 10:45:34 -0400 From: Michel Thebeau <michel.thebeau@windriver.com> To: Marcel Schaible <marcel@schaible-consulting.de>, <starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io> Subject: Re: [Starlingx-discuss] Duplex: CEPH HEALTH_WARN after initial unlock of controller-0 Message-ID: <1557240334.3107.17.camel@windriver.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Hi Marcel, Until the second node of the duplex configuration is configured and unlocked one expects the ceph cluster would be "unhealthy", yes. === It seems to me that the documentation is not obvious on that subject, but I'm not sure it needs to be. If I understand the examples correctly, on AIO-Simplex (one node), we set the "Ceph pool replication to 1. This step applies to AIO-SX only.", and therefore we expect ceph to become healthy for the simplex configuration. But with duplex, your pool replication is 2... so it is waiting for the second cluster node to come up. Duplex instruction: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/StarlingX/Containers/InstallationOnAIOD X#Configure_Ceph_for_Controller-0 Duplex then refers to a portion of simplex instruction for ceph configuration https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/StarlingX/Containers/Installation#Confi gure_Ceph_for_Controller-0 M On Thu, 2019-05-02 at 15:20 +0200, Marcel Schaible wrote:
------------------------------ Message: 3 Date: Tue, 7 May 2019 07:52:50 -0700 From: Saul Wold <sgw@linux.intel.com> To: "Penney, Don" <Don.Penney@windriver.com>, "starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io" <starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io> Subject: Re: [Starlingx-discuss] Re-branding wrsroot proposal Message-ID: <e98ae9c6-c75f-6bac-3c2d-ddfa7e45d78e@linux.intel.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed On 5/7/19 7:37 AM, Penney, Don wrote:
3 characters ;)
ENOTAWAKE! Alex suggested shortening admin -> adm, good thought sysadm deployadm cloudadm edgeadm A rif on Controller: ctrladm conadm Trying new terms! Sau!
------------------------------ Message: 4 Date: Tue, 7 May 2019 14:55:12 +0000 From: "Penney, Don" <Don.Penney@windriver.com> To: Saul Wold <sgw@linux.intel.com>, "starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io" <starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io> Subject: Re: [Starlingx-discuss] Re-branding wrsroot proposal Message-ID: <6703202FD9FDFF4A8DA9ACF104AE129FBA494CE8@ALA-MBD.corp.ad.wrs.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Of those, I'd prefer "sysadm". It's very accurate and stays generic enough in its purpose. It's an account for system administration, with no implications about the purpose of the system or when it's used. So for me: sysadmin or sysadm (and I save 25% typing with sysadm!!) -----Original Message----- From: Saul Wold [mailto:sgw@linux.intel.com] Sent: Tuesday, May 07, 2019 10:53 AM To: Penney, Don; starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io Subject: Re: [Starlingx-discuss] Re-branding wrsroot proposal On 5/7/19 7:37 AM, Penney, Don wrote:
3 characters ;)
ENOTAWAKE! Alex suggested shortening admin -> adm, good thought sysadm deployadm cloudadm edgeadm A rif on Controller: ctrladm conadm Trying new terms! Sau!
------------------------------ Subject: Digest Footer _______________________________________________ Starlingx-discuss mailing list Starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io http://lists.starlingx.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/starlingx-discuss ------------------------------ End of Starlingx-discuss Digest, Vol 12, Issue 35 *************************************************
"admin" +1 It's shorter than sysadmin. ________________________________________ From: Liu, Tao [Tao.Liu@windriver.com] Sent: Tuesday, May 07, 2019 10:36 PM To: starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io Subject: Re: [Starlingx-discuss] Re-branding wrsroot proposal sysadmin +1 -----Original Message----- From: Xie, Cindy [mailto:cindy.xie@intel.com] Sent: May 7, 2019 10:42 To: Bujold, Kristine <Kristine.Bujold@windriver.com>; Penney, Don <Don.Penney@windriver.com>; Saul Wold <sgw@linux.intel.com>; starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io Subject: Re: [Starlingx-discuss] Re-branding wrsroot proposal Sysadmin + 1, easier to spell then deployadmin. -----Original Message----- From: Bujold, Kristine [mailto:Kristine.Bujold@windriver.com] Sent: Tuesday, May 7, 2019 10:41 PM To: Penney, Don <Don.Penney@windriver.com>; Saul Wold <sgw@linux.intel.com>; starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io Subject: Re: [Starlingx-discuss] Re-branding wrsroot proposal sysadmin +1 -----Original Message----- From: Penney, Don [mailto:Don.Penney@windriver.com] Sent: Tuesday, May 7, 2019 10:38 AM To: Saul Wold <sgw@linux.intel.com>; starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io Subject: Re: [Starlingx-discuss] Re-branding wrsroot proposal 3 characters ;) -----Original Message----- From: Saul Wold [mailto:sgw@linux.intel.com] Sent: Tuesday, May 07, 2019 10:36 AM To: starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io Subject: Re: [Starlingx-discuss] Re-branding wrsroot proposal On 5/7/19 6:51 AM, Penney, Don wrote:
I'd vote -1 on deployadmin based on length alone. It would be nice to keep it short... less typing :)
It's only 2 characters longer than sysadmin and it is descriptive of the account. Just saying, no vote yet from me.. Sau!
_______________________________________________ Starlingx-discuss mailing list Starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io http://lists.starlingx.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/starlingx-discuss _______________________________________________ Starlingx-discuss mailing list Starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io http://lists.starlingx.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/starlingx-discuss _______________________________________________ Starlingx-discuss mailing list Starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io http://lists.starlingx.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/starlingx-discuss _______________________________________________ Starlingx-discuss mailing list Starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io http://lists.starlingx.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/starlingx-discuss ------------------------------ Message: 2 Date: Tue, 7 May 2019 10:45:34 -0400 From: Michel Thebeau <michel.thebeau@windriver.com> To: Marcel Schaible <marcel@schaible-consulting.de>, <starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io> Subject: Re: [Starlingx-discuss] Duplex: CEPH HEALTH_WARN after initial unlock of controller-0 Message-ID: <1557240334.3107.17.camel@windriver.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Hi Marcel, Until the second node of the duplex configuration is configured and unlocked one expects the ceph cluster would be "unhealthy", yes. === It seems to me that the documentation is not obvious on that subject, but I'm not sure it needs to be. If I understand the examples correctly, on AIO-Simplex (one node), we set the "Ceph pool replication to 1. This step applies to AIO-SX only.", and therefore we expect ceph to become healthy for the simplex configuration. But with duplex, your pool replication is 2... so it is waiting for the second cluster node to come up. Duplex instruction: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/StarlingX/Containers/InstallationOnAIOD X#Configure_Ceph_for_Controller-0 Duplex then refers to a portion of simplex instruction for ceph configuration https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/StarlingX/Containers/Installation#Confi gure_Ceph_for_Controller-0 M On Thu, 2019-05-02 at 15:20 +0200, Marcel Schaible wrote:
------------------------------ Message: 3 Date: Tue, 7 May 2019 07:52:50 -0700 From: Saul Wold <sgw@linux.intel.com> To: "Penney, Don" <Don.Penney@windriver.com>, "starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io" <starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io> Subject: Re: [Starlingx-discuss] Re-branding wrsroot proposal Message-ID: <e98ae9c6-c75f-6bac-3c2d-ddfa7e45d78e@linux.intel.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed On 5/7/19 7:37 AM, Penney, Don wrote:
3 characters ;)
ENOTAWAKE! Alex suggested shortening admin -> adm, good thought sysadm deployadm cloudadm edgeadm A rif on Controller: ctrladm conadm Trying new terms! Sau!
------------------------------ Message: 4 Date: Tue, 7 May 2019 14:55:12 +0000 From: "Penney, Don" <Don.Penney@windriver.com> To: Saul Wold <sgw@linux.intel.com>, "starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io" <starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io> Subject: Re: [Starlingx-discuss] Re-branding wrsroot proposal Message-ID: <6703202FD9FDFF4A8DA9ACF104AE129FBA494CE8@ALA-MBD.corp.ad.wrs.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Of those, I'd prefer "sysadm". It's very accurate and stays generic enough in its purpose. It's an account for system administration, with no implications about the purpose of the system or when it's used. So for me: sysadmin or sysadm (and I save 25% typing with sysadm!!) -----Original Message----- From: Saul Wold [mailto:sgw@linux.intel.com] Sent: Tuesday, May 07, 2019 10:53 AM To: Penney, Don; starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io Subject: Re: [Starlingx-discuss] Re-branding wrsroot proposal On 5/7/19 7:37 AM, Penney, Don wrote:
3 characters ;)
ENOTAWAKE! Alex suggested shortening admin -> adm, good thought sysadm deployadm cloudadm edgeadm A rif on Controller: ctrladm conadm Trying new terms! Sau!
------------------------------ Subject: Digest Footer _______________________________________________ Starlingx-discuss mailing list Starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io http://lists.starlingx.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/starlingx-discuss ------------------------------ End of Starlingx-discuss Digest, Vol 12, Issue 35 ************************************************* _______________________________________________ Starlingx-discuss mailing list Starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io http://lists.starlingx.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/starlingx-discuss
participants (2)
-
Liu, Tao
-
Poncea, Ovidiu