New subject: [Starlingx-discuss] [ Test ] Sanity results - summary posted

11 Sep 2018

      Juan Carlos,

I am confused.  Why are we looking at the behaviour of ISOs from August?  That seems like a waste of time.  If I look at the sanity page, ISOs have been produced since then:

https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/StarlingX/Test#Latest_ISO_image_Sanity_Summa...

The latest used there is Sept 6th?  I believe that Mitch's ISO is more recent than that; I would have to check.

Is there a reason we are not discussing the September 10th build?  Does it display the same installer error on the console of controller-1?  Certainly, we have not seen that virtually or physically on any system.

Regards,
Ken Y

On 2018-09-11, 4:07 PM, "Alonso, Juan Carlos" <juan.carlos.alonso@intel.com> wrote:

    Hi,

    I also posted a comment on 1790213 with some findings.
    About the ISO sharing, I don't know if we are still able to continue with it.

    The installation fail on compute nodes have the same behavior.

    Regards.
    Juan Carlos Alonso

    -----Original Message-----
    From: Michel Thebeau [mailto:michel.thebeau@windriver.com] 
    Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2018 2:09 PM
    To: Khalil, Ghada <Ghada.Khalil@windriver.com>; Alonso, Juan Carlos <juan.carlos.alonso@intel.com>; Martinez Monroy, Elio <elio.martinez.monroy@intel.com>; Jones, Bruce E <bruce.e.jones@intel.com>; Cabrales, Ada <ada.cabrales@intel.com>; starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io
    Subject: Re: [ Test ] Sanity results - summary posted

    Hi Ghada,

    I have posted a comment on #1790716 recommending closing that bug, but referring everyone to #1790213.

    I have not yet received the iso named stx-2018-08-30-97, but the iso
    stx-2018-08-28-88 presented a broken installer on the controller-1 console:

    " Error populating transaction after 10 retries: failure: 
    Packages/python2-qpid-proton-0.24.0-1.el7.x86_64.rpm from anaconda: 
    [Errno 256] No more mirrors to try."

    I think one could refocus on finding out why the installer broke after 2018-08-25-81, before 2018-08-28-88

    M

    On 2018-09-11 09:53 AM, Khalil, Ghada wrote:
    > Hello Juan,
    > I read the notes in the Launchpad.
    >
    > And, just to confirm, are you following the instructions under:  
    > https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/StarlingX/Installation_Guide_Virtual_E
    > nvironment/Controller_Storage and still reproducing the two issues 
    > below?
    >
    > I was not able to definitively tell from the Launchpad notes. It's important that both our teams are comparing apples to apples.
    >
    > Thanks,
    > Ghada
    >
    > -----Original Message-----
    > From: Alonso, Juan Carlos [mailto:juan.carlos.alonso@intel.com]
    > Sent: Monday, September 10, 2018 1:50 PM
    > To: Khalil, Ghada; Martinez Monroy, Elio; Jones, Bruce E; Cabrales, 
    > Ada; starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io; Thebeau, Michel
    > Subject: RE: [ Test ] Sanity results - summary posted
    >
    > Hi,
    >
    > Such launchpads were updated.
    >
    > A VM was set to upload the ISO tx-2018-08-28-88.iso, such ISO present two issues. Michael will upload his ISO, then we will re test witch each iso in our environment.
    >
    > An script is being developed to get the differences between ISOs.
    >
    > Regards.
    > Juan Carlos Alonso
    >
    > -----Original Message-----
    > From: Khalil, Ghada [mailto:Ghada.Khalil@windriver.com]
    > Sent: Friday, September 7, 2018 4:43 PM
    > To: Khalil, Ghada <Ghada.Khalil@windriver.com>; Martinez Monroy, Elio 
    > <elio.martinez.monroy@intel.com>; Jones, Bruce E 
    > <bruce.e.jones@intel.com>; Cabrales, Ada <ada.cabrales@intel.com>; 
    > starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io; Thebeau, Michel 
    > <Michel.Thebeau@windriver.com>
    > Subject: Re: [Starlingx-discuss] [ Test ] Sanity results - summary 
    > posted
    >
    > Hi Elio/Ada,
    > Are there any updates from your side on these two Launchpads?
    > https://bugs.launchpad.net/starlingx/+bug/1790213
    > https://bugs.launchpad.net/starlingx/+bug/1790716
    >
    > Michel Thebeau (Wind River) has been trying to reproduce these two issues (following the starlingx wikis) without success for two days now. He has been adding his findings to the bugs and communicating with your team.
    > As a result of his investigation, he will be pushing some small fixes to stx-tools shortly (some cleanup).
    >
    > Please let us know if you need any further help from us.
    >
    > Thanks,
    > Ghada
    >
    > -----Original Message-----
    > From: Khalil, Ghada [mailto:Ghada.Khalil@windriver.com]
    > Sent: Wednesday, September 05, 2018 5:39 PM
    > To: Martinez Monroy, Elio; Jones, Bruce E; Cabrales, Ada; 
    > starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io
    > Subject: Re: [Starlingx-discuss] [ Test ] Sanity results - summary 
    > posted
    >
    > Please see inline. There are notes in all the launchpads as well.
    >
    > I have tagged the last bug for the October release. The rest need more information to determine whether they gate or not: two maybe procedural and one requires more information.
    >
    > -----Original Message-----
    > From: Martinez Monroy, Elio [mailto:elio.martinez.monroy@intel.com]
    > Sent: Wednesday, September 05, 2018 2:23 PM
    > To: Jones, Bruce E; Cabrales, Ada; 
    > starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io
    > Subject: Re: [Starlingx-discuss] [ Test ] Sanity results - summary 
    > posted
    >
    > My opinion below
    >
    > -----Original Message-----
    > From: Jones, Bruce E [mailto:bruce.e.jones@intel.com]
    > Sent: Wednesday, September 5, 2018 12:56 PM
    > To: Cabrales, Ada <ada.cabrales@intel.com>; 
    > starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io
    > Subject: Re: [Starlingx-discuss] [ Test ] Sanity results - summary 
    > posted
    >
    > Should the bugs coming out of this be tagged/fixed for the October release?
    >
    > Related bugs:
    > https://bugs.launchpad.net/starlingx/+bug/1790213 < --- Must, this bug is related with 2nd controller provisioning [[GK]] Using the instructions published on the wiki, our designer was not able to reproduce this issue. What instructions are the test team using?
    >
    > https://bugs.launchpad.net/starlingx/+bug/1790514 < --- Can wait until other issues are solved, will fail some test cases related to SSH [[GK]] Requested more information. This cannot be debugged further without this information.
    >
    > https://bugs.launchpad.net/starlingx/+bug/1790716 < --- Must, all 
    > instances need at least one compute for multimode [[GK]] Using the 
    > instructions published on the wiki, our designer was not able to 
    > reproduce this issue. The test team points to internal instructions 
    > which we have no access to. The supported install recipes need to be 
    > on the wiki. I think it is an invalid bug
    >
    > https://bugs.launchpad.net/starlingx/+bug/1790718 < --- Can wait since is related to FM , test cases will fail [[GK]] As Brent pointed out, this is dependent on the integration of stx-gui which is in progress.
    >
    > -----Original Message-----
    > From: Cabrales, Ada [mailto:ada.cabrales@intel.com]
    > Sent: Wednesday, September 5, 2018 10:50 AM
    > To: starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io
    > Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] [ Test ] Sanity results - summary posted
    >
    > Hello all,
    >
    >      As mentioned on the project meeting today, we're posting the summary of the sanity test runs on the Test wiki [0]. The sanity is triggered each time an ISO is generated (a daily task).
    >
    >     Right now we are posting the results manually, and working on a way for automating it. Logs of the run are not included, if you want to have them, you can contact Elio to get them sent to you.
    >
    >
    > [0] 
    > https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/StarlingX/Test#Latest_ISO_image_Sanity
    > _Summary
    >
    > Regards
    > Ada
    >
    > _______________________________________________
    > Starlingx-discuss mailing list
    > Starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io
    > http://lists.starlingx.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/starlingx-discuss
    > _______________________________________________
    > Starlingx-discuss mailing list
    > Starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io
    > http://lists.starlingx.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/starlingx-discuss
    > _______________________________________________
    > Starlingx-discuss mailing list
    > Starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io
    > http://lists.starlingx.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/starlingx-discuss
    > _______________________________________________
    > Starlingx-discuss mailing list
    > Starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io
    > http://lists.starlingx.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/starlingx-discuss
    > _______________________________________________
    > Starlingx-discuss mailing list
    > Starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io
    > http://lists.starlingx.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/starlingx-discuss

    _______________________________________________
    Starlingx-discuss mailing list
    Starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io
    http://lists.starlingx.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/starlingx-discuss

Re: [Starlingx-discuss] [ Test ] Sanity results - summary posted

Young, Ken

Alonso, Juan Carlos

Cordoba Malibran, Erich

Penney, Don

tags

participants (4)