[Starlingx-discuss] platform-integ-apps stx-rbd-provisioner failed
Hi, During the provision of STX release 5 ( standard dedicated storage), I noticed that platform-integ-apps was failed. I have re-apply but failed. [1] This is the first time I have noticed it with release 5. No such failure during the previous deployment. Only changed I did was, updating gcr.io/kubernetes-helm/tiller tag to 16.10. Already configured Ceph storage backend. Both controllers and worker node is labeled as in the installation guide. Ceph health is also ok. [sysadmin@controller-0 ~(keystone_admin)]$ ceph health detail HEALTH_OK Am I missing something? [1] https://paste.opendev.org/show/808244/ Regards, Danishka
You will need the content from the following commits. https://bugs.launchpad.net/starlingx/+bug/1940696/comments/3 We are going to be doing some testing to make sure that these are the only commits that are needed and then will proceed to cherry-pick these to the r/stx.5.0 branch. At that point we’ll proceed with some formal sanity testing and generating a maintenance release. Bob From: open infra <openinfradn@gmail.com> Date: Monday, August 23, 2021 at 12:37 PM To: "'starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io'" <starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io> Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] platform-integ-apps stx-rbd-provisioner failed [Please note: This e-mail is from an EXTERNAL e-mail address] Hi, During the provision of STX release 5 ( standard dedicated storage), I noticed that platform-integ-apps was failed. I have re-apply but failed. [1] This is the first time I have noticed it with release 5. No such failure during the previous deployment. Only changed I did was, updating gcr.io/kubernetes-helm/tiller<https://urldefense.com/v3/__http:/gcr.io/kubernetes-helm/tiller__;!!AjveYdw8EvQ!Jvw9hDqkmtj-SWsh5IDSLT7n5ynnM2gWWdsz_p8u-kNCU0VebXKtdEsCIbv-Rjk5ii8F4w$> tag to 16.10. Already configured Ceph storage backend. Both controllers and worker node is labeled as in the installation guide. Ceph health is also ok. [sysadmin@controller-0 ~(keystone_admin)]$ ceph health detail HEALTH_OK Am I missing something? [1] https://paste.opendev.org/showYOu /808244/<https://paste.opendev.org/showYOu%20/808244/> Regards, Danishka
Hi Robert, I have updated both files manually and tried to apply platform-integ-apps but still fail. On Tue, Aug 24, 2021 at 1:07 AM Church, Robert <Robert.Church@windriver.com> wrote:
You will need the content from the following commits. https://bugs.launchpad.net/starlingx/+bug/1940696/comments/3
We are going to be doing some testing to make sure that these are the only commits that are needed and then will proceed to cherry-pick these to the r/stx.5.0 branch. At that point we’ll proceed with some formal sanity testing and generating a maintenance release.
There is a small typo in the deployment.yml as mentioned in [1]. [1] https://bugs.launchpad.net/starlingx/+bug/1940696/comments/5 Regards, Danishka
Bob
*From: *open infra <openinfradn@gmail.com> *Date: *Monday, August 23, 2021 at 12:37 PM *To: *"'starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io'" < starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io> *Subject: *[Starlingx-discuss] platform-integ-apps stx-rbd-provisioner failed
[Please note: This e-mail is from an EXTERNAL e-mail address]
Hi,
During the provision of STX release 5 ( standard dedicated storage), I noticed that platform-integ-apps was failed. I have re-apply but failed. [1]
This is the first time I have noticed it with release 5.
No such failure during the previous deployment.
Only changed I did was, updating gcr.io/kubernetes-helm/tiller <https://urldefense.com/v3/__http:/gcr.io/kubernetes-helm/tiller__;!!AjveYdw8EvQ!Jvw9hDqkmtj-SWsh5IDSLT7n5ynnM2gWWdsz_p8u-kNCU0VebXKtdEsCIbv-Rjk5ii8F4w$> tag to 16.10.
Already configured Ceph storage backend.
Both controllers and worker node is labeled as in the installation guide.
Ceph health is also ok.
[sysadmin@controller-0 ~(keystone_admin)]$ ceph health detail
HEALTH_OK
Am I missing something?
[1] https://paste.opendev.org/showYOu /808244/
Regards,
Danishka
How to apply those changes to freshly installed controllers? On Tue, Aug 24, 2021 at 1:07 AM Church, Robert <Robert.Church@windriver.com> wrote:
You will need the content from the following commits. https://bugs.launchpad.net/starlingx/+bug/1940696/comments/3
We are going to be doing some testing to make sure that these are the only commits that are needed and then will proceed to cherry-pick these to the r/stx.5.0 branch. At that point we’ll proceed with some formal sanity testing and generating a maintenance release.
Bob
*From: *open infra <openinfradn@gmail.com> *Date: *Monday, August 23, 2021 at 12:37 PM *To: *"'starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io'" < starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io> *Subject: *[Starlingx-discuss] platform-integ-apps stx-rbd-provisioner failed
[Please note: This e-mail is from an EXTERNAL e-mail address]
Hi,
During the provision of STX release 5 ( standard dedicated storage), I noticed that platform-integ-apps was failed. I have re-apply but failed. [1]
This is the first time I have noticed it with release 5.
No such failure during the previous deployment.
Only changed I did was, updating gcr.io/kubernetes-helm/tiller <https://urldefense.com/v3/__http:/gcr.io/kubernetes-helm/tiller__;!!AjveYdw8EvQ!Jvw9hDqkmtj-SWsh5IDSLT7n5ynnM2gWWdsz_p8u-kNCU0VebXKtdEsCIbv-Rjk5ii8F4w$> tag to 16.10.
Already configured Ceph storage backend.
Both controllers and worker node is labeled as in the installation guide.
Ceph health is also ok.
[sysadmin@controller-0 ~(keystone_admin)]$ ceph health detail
HEALTH_OK
Am I missing something?
[1] https://paste.opendev.org/showYOu /808244/
Regards,
Danishka
After installing, prior to running the bootstrap playbook on controller-0: * Make the changes to the ansible playbook in /usr/share/ansible/stx-ansible/playbooks * Update the helm chart in /usr/local/share/applications/helm/platform-integ-apps-*.tgz Then run the playbook Bob From: open infra <openinfradn@gmail.com> Date: Wednesday, August 25, 2021 at 2:25 AM To: Robert Church <Robert.Church@windriver.com> Cc: "'starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io'" <starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io> Subject: Re: [Starlingx-discuss] platform-integ-apps stx-rbd-provisioner failed [Please note: This e-mail is from an EXTERNAL e-mail address] How to apply those changes to freshly installed controllers? On Tue, Aug 24, 2021 at 1:07 AM Church, Robert <Robert.Church@windriver.com<mailto:Robert.Church@windriver.com>> wrote: You will need the content from the following commits. https://bugs.launchpad.net/starlingx/+bug/1940696/comments/3<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/bugs.launchpad.net/starlingx/*bug/1940696/comments/3__;Kw!!AjveYdw8EvQ!Pr17jNYHUHRLCVwKLvIpRJDfzm5JfJqcyfoQbnwQeVRGzBrxxWJSkmed7P_-a8OUO61loA$> We are going to be doing some testing to make sure that these are the only commits that are needed and then will proceed to cherry-pick these to the r/stx.5.0 branch. At that point we’ll proceed with some formal sanity testing and generating a maintenance release. Bob From: open infra <openinfradn@gmail.com<mailto:openinfradn@gmail.com>> Date: Monday, August 23, 2021 at 12:37 PM To: "'starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io<mailto:starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io>'" <starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io<mailto:starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io>> Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] platform-integ-apps stx-rbd-provisioner failed [Please note: This e-mail is from an EXTERNAL e-mail address] Hi, During the provision of STX release 5 ( standard dedicated storage), I noticed that platform-integ-apps was failed. I have re-apply but failed. [1] This is the first time I have noticed it with release 5. No such failure during the previous deployment. Only changed I did was, updating gcr.io/kubernetes-helm/tiller<https://urldefense.com/v3/__http:/gcr.io/kubernetes-helm/tiller__;!!AjveYdw8EvQ!Jvw9hDqkmtj-SWsh5IDSLT7n5ynnM2gWWdsz_p8u-kNCU0VebXKtdEsCIbv-Rjk5ii8F4w$> tag to 16.10. Already configured Ceph storage backend. Both controllers and worker node is labeled as in the installation guide. Ceph health is also ok. [sysadmin@controller-0 ~(keystone_admin)]$ ceph health detail HEALTH_OK Am I missing something? [1] https://paste.opendev.org/showYOu /808244/<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/paste.opendev.org/showYOu*20/808244/__;JQ!!AjveYdw8EvQ!Pr17jNYHUHRLCVwKLvIpRJDfzm5JfJqcyfoQbnwQeVRGzBrxxWJSkmed7P_-a8PZuwSG9g$> Regards, Danishka
participants (2)
-
Church, Robert
-
open infra