[Starlingx-discuss] [Build] Input Needed - stx-nova build issue on r/stx.7.0
Branch r/stx.7.0 can build ISO's, but container builds remain broken on stx-nova. stx-nova's issues started with spice-html5. The first issue was spice-html5's github repo, forcing a move to gitlab's copy of the spice-html5. The move to gitlab went smoothly for debian (master and r/stx.8.0), but is failing to clone from r/stx.7.0 centos. It appears gitlab requires a newer version git. Centos is using version 1.8.x. Debain is using a version 2.x.x. We have a few options: 1) r/stx.7.0 needs to find a way to inject a newer version of git into the Loci CentOS container that stx-nova is based on. A tricky thing to fix. 2) Move to a newer version of Centos across all Loci images, Prohibitive cost. 3) Discontinue container builds for r/stx.7.0 4) Selectively discontinue builds of stx-nova and any other image needing spice-html5 for r/stx.7.0 Thoughts? Scott
Technically STX7 is not EOL until Sep 2023. Would be nice to keep it build-able for another 4x months. Is there another option to rollback the move to gitlab's copy of the spice-html5, in STX 7.0 ? For option 4), would it only be stx-nova that would be unbuildable for 4x months ? Greg. -----Original Message----- From: Scott Little <scott.little@windriver.com> Sent: Wednesday, May 24, 2023 10:30 AM To: starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] [Build] Input Needed - stx-nova build issue on r/stx.7.0 Branch r/stx.7.0 can build ISO's, but container builds remain broken on stx-nova. stx-nova's issues started with spice-html5. The first issue was spice-html5's github repo, forcing a move to gitlab's copy of the spice-html5. The move to gitlab went smoothly for debian (master and r/stx.8.0), but is failing to clone from r/stx.7.0 centos. It appears gitlab requires a newer version git. Centos is using version 1.8.x. Debain is using a version 2.x.x. We have a few options: 1) r/stx.7.0 needs to find a way to inject a newer version of git into the Loci CentOS container that stx-nova is based on. A tricky thing to fix. 2) Move to a newer version of Centos across all Loci images, Prohibitive cost. 3) Discontinue container builds for r/stx.7.0 4) Selectively discontinue builds of stx-nova and any other image needing spice-html5 for r/stx.7.0 Thoughts? Scott _______________________________________________ Starlingx-discuss mailing list Starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io
Replies inline below, Scott On 2023-05-24 12:38, Waines, Greg wrote:
Technically STX7 is not EOL until Sep 2023. Would be nice to keep it build-able for another 4x months.
Is there another option to rollback the move to gitlab's copy of the spice-html5, in STX 7.0 ? [SL] The github URL was deleted. There is no going back.
For option 4), would it only be stx-nova that would be unbuildable for 4x months ? [SL] Correct.
Greg.
-----Original Message----- From: Scott Little <scott.little@windriver.com> Sent: Wednesday, May 24, 2023 10:30 AM To: starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] [Build] Input Needed - stx-nova build issue on r/stx.7.0
Branch r/stx.7.0 can build ISO's, but container builds remain broken on stx-nova.
stx-nova's issues started with spice-html5. The first issue was spice-html5's github repo, forcing a move to gitlab's copy of the spice-html5. The move to gitlab went smoothly for debian (master and r/stx.8.0), but is failing to clone from r/stx.7.0 centos. It appears gitlab requires a newer version git. Centos is using version 1.8.x. Debain is using a version 2.x.x.
We have a few options:
1) r/stx.7.0 needs to find a way to inject a newer version of git into the Loci CentOS container that stx-nova is based on. A tricky thing to fix.
2) Move to a newer version of Centos across all Loci images, Prohibitive cost.
3) Discontinue container builds for r/stx.7.0
4) Selectively discontinue builds of stx-nova and any other image needing spice-html5 for r/stx.7.0
Thoughts?
Scott
_______________________________________________ Starlingx-discuss mailing list Starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io
On 2023-05-29 10:46, Scott Little wrote:
Replies inline below,
Scott
On 2023-05-24 12:38, Waines, Greg wrote:
Technically STX7 is not EOL until Sep 2023. Would be nice to keep it build-able for another 4x months.
Is there another option to rollback the move to gitlab's copy of the spice-html5, in STX 7.0 ? [SL] The github URL was deleted. There is no going back.
For option 4), would it only be stx-nova that would be unbuildable for 4x months ? [SL] Correct.
Greg.
-----Original Message----- From: Scott Little <scott.little@windriver.com> Sent: Wednesday, May 24, 2023 10:30 AM To: starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] [Build] Input Needed - stx-nova build issue on r/stx.7.0
Branch r/stx.7.0 can build ISO's, but container builds remain broken on stx-nova.
stx-nova's issues started with spice-html5. The first issue was spice-html5's github repo, forcing a move to gitlab's copy of the spice-html5. The move to gitlab went smoothly for debian (master and r/stx.8.0), but is failing to clone from r/stx.7.0 centos. It appears gitlab requires a newer version git. Centos is using version 1.8.x. Debain is using a version 2.x.x.
We have a few options:
1) r/stx.7.0 needs to find a way to inject a newer version of git into the Loci CentOS container that stx-nova is based on. A tricky thing to fix.
2) Move to a newer version of Centos across all Loci images, Prohibitive cost.
3) Discontinue container builds for r/stx.7.0
4) Selectively discontinue builds of stx-nova and any other image needing spice-html5 for r/stx.7.0
Thoughts?
Scott
_______________________________________________ Starlingx-discuss mailing list Starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io
participants (3)
-
Scott Little
-
Scott.Little
-
Waines, Greg