[Starlingx-discuss] EdgeX deeper integration?
We had an internal discussion today about EdgeX. We are seeing signs of it increasing in use and importance in the Edge ecosystem. It is fairly straightforward to build and run an EdgeX application under StarlingX today. We had it running in the Intel booth at the Denver Summit. My question for the community is this: Is there value or interest in making EdgeX apps even easier to run within StarlingX? For example, we could create an EdgeX application in StarlingX and allow users to apply it to the system, to allow the EdgeX services to run and be managed by StarlingX. This would add some ease of use benefits for EdgeX users while also putting us in the position of maintaining an up to date version of EdgeX. Is this something we should work on as a community? brucej
Actually, in the ongoing review for the pytest framework there is this setup of EdgeX in k8s. https://review.opendev.org/#/c/665419/3/automated-pytest-suite/testcases/fun... This could be a good start point to create an EdgeX application. -Erich On Thu, 2019-06-27 at 19:54 +0000, Jones, Bruce E wrote:
We had an internal discussion today about EdgeX. We are seeing signs of it increasing in use and importance in the Edge ecosystem.
It is fairly straightforward to build and run an EdgeX application under StarlingX today. We had it running in the Intel booth at the Denver Summit.
My question for the community is this: Is there value or interest in making EdgeX apps even easier to run within StarlingX? For example, we could create an EdgeX application in StarlingX and allow users to apply it to the system, to allow the EdgeX services to run and be managed by StarlingX. This would add some ease of use benefits for EdgeX users while also putting us in the position of maintaining an up to date version of EdgeX.
Is this something we should work on as a community?
brucej
_______________________________________________ Starlingx-discuss mailing list Starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io http://lists.starlingx.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/starlingx-discuss
There's definitely interest from the Akraino/StarlingX perspective. For those that aren't aware, the EdgeX Foundry application is part of Akraino's StarlingX blueprint [0]. As plans unfold for the next release of Akraino, we will be happy to have contributions in this area. [0] https://wiki.akraino.org/display/AK/StarlingX+Far+Edge+Distributed+Cloud -----Original Message----- From: Cordoba Malibran, Erich <erich.cordoba.malibran@intel.com> Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2019 5:01 PM To: Jones, Bruce E <bruce.e.jones@intel.com>; starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io Subject: Re: [Starlingx-discuss] EdgeX deeper integration? Actually, in the ongoing review for the pytest framework there is this setup of EdgeX in k8s. https://review.opendev.org/#/c/665419/3/automated-pytest-suite/testcases/fun... This could be a good start point to create an EdgeX application. -Erich On Thu, 2019-06-27 at 19:54 +0000, Jones, Bruce E wrote:
We had an internal discussion today about EdgeX. We are seeing signs of it increasing in use and importance in the Edge ecosystem.
It is fairly straightforward to build and run an EdgeX application under StarlingX today. We had it running in the Intel booth at the Denver Summit.
My question for the community is this: Is there value or interest in making EdgeX apps even easier to run within StarlingX? For example, we could create an EdgeX application in StarlingX and allow users to apply it to the system, to allow the EdgeX services to run and be managed by StarlingX. This would add some ease of use benefits for EdgeX users while also putting us in the position of maintaining an up to date version of EdgeX.
Is this something we should work on as a community?
brucej
_______________________________________________ Starlingx-discuss mailing list Starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io http://lists.starlingx.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/starlingx-discuss
Starlingx-discuss mailing list Starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io http://lists.starlingx.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/starlingx-discuss
StarlingX Akraino blueprint is focused on validation of EdgeX Foundry services running on StralingX far edge cluster by providing an integration CI/CD pipeline. And we definitely need some improvements in our current implementation. As you can see from our test_kube_edgex_services.py test script I used not really mature open-source project for EdgeX on Kubernetes [0] Creation of official EdgeX application would benefit to all involved projects. [0] https://github.com/rohitsardesai83/edgex-on-kubernetes -----Original Message----- From: Zvonar, Bill [mailto:Bill.Zvonar@windriver.com] Sent: Friday, 28 June, 2019 09:02 To: Cordoba Malibran, Erich; Jones, Bruce E; starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io Subject: Re: [Starlingx-discuss] EdgeX deeper integration? There's definitely interest from the Akraino/StarlingX perspective. For those that aren't aware, the EdgeX Foundry application is part of Akraino's StarlingX blueprint [0]. As plans unfold for the next release of Akraino, we will be happy to have contributions in this area. [0] https://wiki.akraino.org/display/AK/StarlingX+Far+Edge+Distributed+Cloud -----Original Message----- From: Cordoba Malibran, Erich <erich.cordoba.malibran@intel.com> Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2019 5:01 PM To: Jones, Bruce E <bruce.e.jones@intel.com>; starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io Subject: Re: [Starlingx-discuss] EdgeX deeper integration? Actually, in the ongoing review for the pytest framework there is this setup of EdgeX in k8s. https://review.opendev.org/#/c/665419/3/automated-pytest-suite/testcases/fun... This could be a good start point to create an EdgeX application. -Erich On Thu, 2019-06-27 at 19:54 +0000, Jones, Bruce E wrote:
We had an internal discussion today about EdgeX. We are seeing signs of it increasing in use and importance in the Edge ecosystem.
It is fairly straightforward to build and run an EdgeX application under StarlingX today. We had it running in the Intel booth at the Denver Summit.
My question for the community is this: Is there value or interest in making EdgeX apps even easier to run within StarlingX? For example, we could create an EdgeX application in StarlingX and allow users to apply it to the system, to allow the EdgeX services to run and be managed by StarlingX. This would add some ease of use benefits for EdgeX users while also putting us in the position of maintaining an up to date version of EdgeX.
Is this something we should work on as a community?
brucej
_______________________________________________ Starlingx-discuss mailing list Starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io http://lists.starlingx.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/starlingx-discuss
Starlingx-discuss mailing list Starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io http://lists.starlingx.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/starlingx-discuss _______________________________________________ Starlingx-discuss mailing list Starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io http://lists.starlingx.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/starlingx-discuss
Alex, About "official EdgeX application", did you mean an Armada application with helm charts in the context of StarlingX? If so, I think it's worth making it as an "optional" application and sysadmin can install/apply it when needed. On 09/07/2019, 5:04 AM, "Kozyrev, Alexander (Alex)" <Alex.Kozyrev@windriver.com> wrote: StarlingX Akraino blueprint is focused on validation of EdgeX Foundry services running on StralingX far edge cluster by providing an integration CI/CD pipeline. And we definitely need some improvements in our current implementation. As you can see from our test_kube_edgex_services.py test script I used not really mature open-source project for EdgeX on Kubernetes [0] Creation of official EdgeX application would benefit to all involved projects. [0] https://github.com/rohitsardesai83/edgex-on-kubernetes -----Original Message----- From: Zvonar, Bill [mailto:Bill.Zvonar@windriver.com] Sent: Friday, 28 June, 2019 09:02 To: Cordoba Malibran, Erich; Jones, Bruce E; starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io Subject: Re: [Starlingx-discuss] EdgeX deeper integration? There's definitely interest from the Akraino/StarlingX perspective. For those that aren't aware, the EdgeX Foundry application is part of Akraino's StarlingX blueprint [0]. As plans unfold for the next release of Akraino, we will be happy to have contributions in this area. [0] https://wiki.akraino.org/display/AK/StarlingX+Far+Edge+Distributed+Cloud -----Original Message----- From: Cordoba Malibran, Erich <erich.cordoba.malibran@intel.com> Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2019 5:01 PM To: Jones, Bruce E <bruce.e.jones@intel.com>; starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io Subject: Re: [Starlingx-discuss] EdgeX deeper integration? Actually, in the ongoing review for the pytest framework there is this setup of EdgeX in k8s. https://review.opendev.org/#/c/665419/3/automated-pytest-suite/testcases/fun... This could be a good start point to create an EdgeX application. -Erich On Thu, 2019-06-27 at 19:54 +0000, Jones, Bruce E wrote: > We had an internal discussion today about EdgeX. We are seeing signs > of it increasing in use and importance in the Edge ecosystem. > > It is fairly straightforward to build and run an EdgeX application > under StarlingX today. We had it running in the Intel booth at the > Denver Summit. > > My question for the community is this: Is there value or interest in > making EdgeX apps even easier to run within StarlingX? For example, > we could create an EdgeX application in StarlingX and allow users to > apply it to the system, to allow the EdgeX services to run and be > managed by StarlingX. This would add some ease of use benefits for > EdgeX users while also putting us in the position of maintaining an up > to date version of EdgeX. > > Is this something we should work on as a community? > > brucej > > > > _______________________________________________ > Starlingx-discuss mailing list > Starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io > http://lists.starlingx.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/starlingx-discuss _______________________________________________ Starlingx-discuss mailing list Starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io http://lists.starlingx.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/starlingx-discuss _______________________________________________ Starlingx-discuss mailing list Starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io http://lists.starlingx.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/starlingx-discuss _______________________________________________ Starlingx-discuss mailing list Starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io http://lists.starlingx.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/starlingx-discuss
Of course, it could be optional Armada application in the StralingX repo to make things easy. But better yet I would contribute into EdgeX Foundry directly and create helm charts there. Regards, Alex -----Original Message----- From: Hu, Yong [mailto:yong.hu@intel.com] Sent: Tuesday, 09 July, 2019 11:53 To: Kozyrev, Alexander (Alex); Zvonar, Bill; Cordoba Malibran, Erich; Jones, Bruce E; starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io Subject: Re: [Starlingx-discuss] EdgeX deeper integration? Alex, About "official EdgeX application", did you mean an Armada application with helm charts in the context of StarlingX? If so, I think it's worth making it as an "optional" application and sysadmin can install/apply it when needed. On 09/07/2019, 5:04 AM, "Kozyrev, Alexander (Alex)" <Alex.Kozyrev@windriver.com> wrote: StarlingX Akraino blueprint is focused on validation of EdgeX Foundry services running on StralingX far edge cluster by providing an integration CI/CD pipeline. And we definitely need some improvements in our current implementation. As you can see from our test_kube_edgex_services.py test script I used not really mature open-source project for EdgeX on Kubernetes [0] Creation of official EdgeX application would benefit to all involved projects. [0] https://github.com/rohitsardesai83/edgex-on-kubernetes -----Original Message----- From: Zvonar, Bill [mailto:Bill.Zvonar@windriver.com] Sent: Friday, 28 June, 2019 09:02 To: Cordoba Malibran, Erich; Jones, Bruce E; starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io Subject: Re: [Starlingx-discuss] EdgeX deeper integration? There's definitely interest from the Akraino/StarlingX perspective. For those that aren't aware, the EdgeX Foundry application is part of Akraino's StarlingX blueprint [0]. As plans unfold for the next release of Akraino, we will be happy to have contributions in this area. [0] https://wiki.akraino.org/display/AK/StarlingX+Far+Edge+Distributed+Cloud -----Original Message----- From: Cordoba Malibran, Erich <erich.cordoba.malibran@intel.com> Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2019 5:01 PM To: Jones, Bruce E <bruce.e.jones@intel.com>; starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io Subject: Re: [Starlingx-discuss] EdgeX deeper integration? Actually, in the ongoing review for the pytest framework there is this setup of EdgeX in k8s. https://review.opendev.org/#/c/665419/3/automated-pytest-suite/testcases/fun... This could be a good start point to create an EdgeX application. -Erich On Thu, 2019-06-27 at 19:54 +0000, Jones, Bruce E wrote: > We had an internal discussion today about EdgeX. We are seeing signs > of it increasing in use and importance in the Edge ecosystem. > > It is fairly straightforward to build and run an EdgeX application > under StarlingX today. We had it running in the Intel booth at the > Denver Summit. > > My question for the community is this: Is there value or interest in > making EdgeX apps even easier to run within StarlingX? For example, > we could create an EdgeX application in StarlingX and allow users to > apply it to the system, to allow the EdgeX services to run and be > managed by StarlingX. This would add some ease of use benefits for > EdgeX users while also putting us in the position of maintaining an up > to date version of EdgeX. > > Is this something we should work on as a community? > > brucej > > > > _______________________________________________ > Starlingx-discuss mailing list > Starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io > http://lists.starlingx.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/starlingx-discuss _______________________________________________ Starlingx-discuss mailing list Starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io http://lists.starlingx.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/starlingx-discuss _______________________________________________ Starlingx-discuss mailing list Starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io http://lists.starlingx.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/starlingx-discuss _______________________________________________ Starlingx-discuss mailing list Starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io http://lists.starlingx.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/starlingx-discuss
participants (5)
-
Cordoba Malibran, Erich
-
Hu, Yong
-
Jones, Bruce E
-
Kozyrev, Alexander (Alex)
-
Zvonar, Bill