[Starlingx-discuss] StarlingX Master Branch Successful Compilation
We have a successful built of StarlingX ISO based on Master branch using Developer Guide [0] Please use Github page [1] as a documentation support. Environment: - Workstation - Xeon 3.8 GHz 4 Cores - RAM 16 GB - SSD 500 GB - Build time: ~ 6 hours Requirements: - Build process started 7/26/2018 18:00 PST - stx-tools master branch - latest change: Merge "Add repo for finding older python packages" c4b5cd26a2140b999f0540a16d41d53ea4ee7060 - Temporal! Changes, already in Developer Guide - RPM Macros + Sphinxcontrib Versions Changed https://review.openstack.org/#/c/586393/ [0] https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/StarlingX/Developer_Guide [1] https://github.com/xe1gyq/starlingx/blob/master/DeveloperGuide.md
Abraham, This is great! Can we have a manifest with the commitID associated for this particular build? Thx. - cindy -----Original Message----- From: Arce Moreno, Abraham [mailto:abraham.arce.moreno@intel.com] Sent: Friday, July 27, 2018 1:38 PM To: starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] StarlingX Master Branch Successful Compilation We have a successful built of StarlingX ISO based on Master branch using Developer Guide [0] Please use Github page [1] as a documentation support. Environment: - Workstation - Xeon 3.8 GHz 4 Cores - RAM 16 GB - SSD 500 GB - Build time: ~ 6 hours Requirements: - Build process started 7/26/2018 18:00 PST - stx-tools master branch - latest change: Merge "Add repo for finding older python packages" c4b5cd26a2140b999f0540a16d41d53ea4ee7060 - Temporal! Changes, already in Developer Guide - RPM Macros + Sphinxcontrib Versions Changed https://review.openstack.org/#/c/586393/ [0] https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/StarlingX/Developer_Guide [1] https://github.com/xe1gyq/starlingx/blob/master/DeveloperGuide.md _______________________________________________ Starlingx-discuss mailing list Starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io http://lists.starlingx.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/starlingx-discuss
This is great! Can we have a manifest with the commitID associated for this particular build?
Sure Cindy. Here you have 2 manifests of 2 successful builds, reason? I am somehow confused about the content of our manifest with the information found at our Developer Guide [0] based on how we initialized the manifest: repo init -u https://git.starlingx.io/stx-manifest.git -m default.xml I appreciate community corrections please. I was assuming this was the master but default revision is pointing to m/2018.07. Anyway, I went an build again changing the default revision to master. Next see the details and links, repo was created using the line: repo manifest -r -o my-manifest.xml [Details / Links] Default Revision m/2018.07 [1] The resulting manifest [2] stx-manifest/tree/default.xml content: <remote name="stx-staging" fetch="https://github.com/starlingx-staging"/> <default revision="m/2018.07"/> <project remote="starlingx" revision="m/2018.07" name="stx-tools.git" path="stx-tools"/> Default Revision Master [3] The resulting manifest [4] stx-manifest/tree/default.xml?h=m/2018.07 content: <remote name="stx-staging" fetch="https://github.com/starlingx-staging"/> <default revision="master" remote="stx-staging"/> <project remote="starlingx" revision="master" name="stx-tools.git" path="stx-tools"/> As an additional information, I complete a parallel build of StarlingX using a Digital Ocean virtual machine. It took ~ 7 hours, the specs were: 2 vCPUs, RAM 4 GB, Disk 80 GB. [0] https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/StarlingX/Developer_Guide [1] https://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/stx-manifest/tree/default.xml [2] https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/stx-manifest-2018.07 [3] https://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/stx-manifest/tree/default.xml?h=m/2... [4] https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/stx-manifest-master
On Fri, Jul 27, 2018 at 10:07 AM, Arce Moreno, Abraham <abraham.arce.moreno@intel.com> wrote:
I appreciate community corrections please. I was assuming this was the master but default revision is pointing to m/2018.07. Anyway, I went an build again changing the default revision to master. Next see the details and links, repo was created using the line:
So yup, the manifests were backwards. I committed the branch update to master rather than the m/2018.07 branch. Yay for practice runs! I've cherry-picked the change to the right branch and reverted the original in https://review.openstack.org/586637 and https://review.openstack.org/586638. dt -- Dean Troyer dtroyer@gmail.com
participants (3)
-
Arce Moreno, Abraham
-
Dean Troyer
-
Xie, Cindy