[Starlingx-discuss] [Containers] Feature - Provision dbmon for AIO-DX and DC systemcontroller
Hi Bin I'm checking this patch [1] for dbmon on AIO-DX, and I'm seeing that after application apply that service is show as below: ---- ACTIVE CONTROLLER ----- wrsroot@controller-0 ~(keystone_admin)]$ sudo sm-dump --verbose |grep dbmon dbmon enabled-active unknown failed action-failure ---- STANDBY CONTROLLER ----- controller-1:~$ sudo sm-dump --verbose |grep dbmon dbmon enabled-standby unknown failed action-failure Is that expected, I see that is actually `enabled-active` shall we rely on this filed because I don't know what other fields (unknown, failed, action-failure ) means and if this is expected or there is actually a failure. 1- https://review.opendev.org/#/c/650455/ Regards, José
Hi José, When you checked the patch, did you also pick the 2 patches [1] and [2] list as depends-on? Your sm-dump list the following columns: service-name desired-state state status condition dbmon enabled-active unknown failed action-failure dbmon enabled-standby unknown failed action-failure Please note that a bug [3] is being fixed. Also storyboard [4] enhanced the behavior for dbmon. [1] https://review.opendev.org/#/c/650301/ [2] https://review.opendev.org/#/c/650288/ [3] https://bugs.launchpad.net/starlingx/+bug/1826891 [4] https://storyboard.openstack.org/#!/story/2005486 Thanks, Bin ________________________________________ From: Perez Carranza, Jose [jose.perez.carranza@intel.com] Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2019 1:07 PM To: Qian, Bin; 'starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io' Subject: [Containers] Feature - Provision dbmon for AIO-DX and DC systemcontroller Hi Bin I'm checking this patch [1] for dbmon on AIO-DX, and I'm seeing that after application apply that service is show as below: ---- ACTIVE CONTROLLER ----- wrsroot@controller-0 ~(keystone_admin)]$ sudo sm-dump --verbose |grep dbmon dbmon enabled-active unknown failed action-failure ---- STANDBY CONTROLLER ----- controller-1:~$ sudo sm-dump --verbose |grep dbmon dbmon enabled-standby unknown failed action-failure Is that expected, I see that is actually `enabled-active` shall we rely on this filed because I don't know what other fields (unknown, failed, action-failure ) means and if this is expected or there is actually a failure. 1- https://review.opendev.org/#/c/650455/ Regards, José
participants (2)
-
Perez Carranza, Jose
-
Qian, Bin