Re: [Starlingx-discuss] StarlingX Adoption discussions in PTG
Hello Folks, I was going through the PTG discussions and etherpads and came across the topic of community and users. Although I’m a new-ish member of the community, I’d like to highlight some things we can also look at: Discussion Forums (Discourse, GitHub Discussions): We are using mailing lists for all discussions today. Most cloud-native projects are using Discourse forums (e.g. Kubernetes<https://discuss.kubernetes.io/>, Docker<https://forums.docker.com/>, LXC, LXD, LXCFS<https://discuss.linuxcontainers.org/>, etc. – virtually everyone in this space is part of a Discourse community. I want to double-stress this point actually). IJ >> I agree that Discourse is something we should look at – if you join the community call I am sure you would get some feedback. But perhaps it doesn’t work for your timezone. GitHub recently announced the Beta of Discussions<https://github.blog/2020-05-06-new-from-satellite-2020-github-codespaces-github-discussions-securing-code-in-private-repositories-and-more/#discussions>. If STX is looking to build a community there, Discussions might be a nice, low-cost place to host the community. Besides this, many communities have Slack and Discord teams. But forums are infinitely more discoverable (if we’re not talking about ad-hoc discussions). Participation in other communities + Adoption Stories: We need to be heavily present (announce CVEs, project updates etc.) in the Kubernetes discussion forums and Slack. CNCF has regular posts from adopters of Kubernetes. If we have users who have adopted STX for their edge, we should invite their architect to promote their company’s blogpost on CNCF’s blog. I think it’s great promotion for the user’s product and for the STX community. Fin’: In my personal experience: I’ve been using and talking about STX for the last 6 months. It is strange that for talking about STX internally, we’re using tools like MS Teams and Slack or Yammer/Discourse/PlanetBlue within our respective companies but the community has a 2nd class experience. In my opinion mailing lists and IRC are not the most modern way of managing large communities for modern, cloud-native projects. I’m sorry if this was already discussed some time ago and this is a repetition (Discourse has cool features to resolve these sorts of discussions btw. 😉) Best Taimoor Intel Deutschland GmbH Registered Address: Am Campeon 10-12, 85579 Neubiberg, Germany Tel: +49 89 99 8853-0, www.intel.de Managing Directors: Christin Eisenschmid, Gary Kershaw Chairperson of the Supervisory Board: Nicole Lau Registered Office: Munich Commercial Register: Amtsgericht Muenchen HRB 186928
participants (1)
-
Jolliffe, Ian