[Starlingx-discuss] MultiOS: replacing tar_scm by obs_scm
Hello, I propose to replace all the call to tar_scm which is deprecated by obs_scm in all _service files. I have done a test in my sand box and it works as before. Any reason why a deprecated service had been used ? Any motive to not use the current OBS source tool ? -- Dominig ar Foll Senior Software Architect Intel Open Source Technology Centre
Hi, Can you provide some more context. Thanks, Brent -----Original Message----- From: Dominig ar Foll (Intel Open Source) [mailto:dominig.arfoll@fridu.net] Sent: Tuesday, September 3, 2019 11:37 AM To: starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] MultiOS: replacing tar_scm by obs_scm Hello, I propose to replace all the call to tar_scm which is deprecated by obs_scm in all _service files. I have done a test in my sand box and it works as before. Any reason why a deprecated service had been used ? Any motive to not use the current OBS source tool ? -- Dominig ar Foll Senior Software Architect Intel Open Source Technology Centre _______________________________________________ Starlingx-discuss mailing list Starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io http://lists.starlingx.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/starlingx-discuss
On 9/3/19 8:37 AM, Dominig ar Foll (Intel Open Source) wrote:
Hello,
I propose to replace all the call to tar_scm which is deprecated by obs_scm in all _service files. I have done a test in my sand box and it works as before. Any reason why a deprecated service had been used ?
I got this info from some wiki page, I did not realize that it was a deprecated service.
Any motive to not use the current OBS source tool ?
Go for it. I am working on a Zuul Job to auto-generate the _service file, I can incorporate your changes into the zuul job when I get it working locally. This review is the Zuul job without the _service file. https://review.opendev.org/#/c/679353/ If your fixing up the fault _service files, I realized that we should stick with .tar.gz files in opensuse that way we get better reuse of the tarball. Sau!
Some more info on that change. https://github.com/openSUSE/obs-service-tar_scm On 03/09/2019 17:49, Saul Wold wrote:
On 9/3/19 8:37 AM, Dominig ar Foll (Intel Open Source) wrote:
Hello,
I propose to replace all the call to tar_scm which is deprecated by obs_scm in all _service files. I have done a test in my sand box and it works as before. Any reason why a deprecated service had been used ?
I got this info from some wiki page, I did not realize that it was a deprecated service.
Any motive to not use the current OBS source tool ?
Go for it. I am working on a Zuul Job to auto-generate the _service file, I can incorporate your changes into the zuul job when I get it working locally.
This review is the Zuul job without the _service file. https://review.opendev.org/#/c/679353/
If your fixing up the fault _service files, I realized that we should stick with .tar.gz files in opensuse that way we get better reuse of the tarball.
Sau!
_______________________________________________ Starlingx-discuss mailing list Starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io http://lists.starlingx.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/starlingx-discuss
-- Dominig ar Foll Senior Software Architect Intel Open Source Technology Centre
Hello, as it seems that it was a simple error, I have corrected all the concerned _service files. Please in future use obs_scm Regards Dominig On 03/09/2019 17:49, Saul Wold wrote:
On 9/3/19 8:37 AM, Dominig ar Foll (Intel Open Source) wrote:
Hello,
I propose to replace all the call to tar_scm which is deprecated by obs_scm in all _service files. I have done a test in my sand box and it works as before. Any reason why a deprecated service had been used ?
I got this info from some wiki page, I did not realize that it was a deprecated service.
Any motive to not use the current OBS source tool ?
Go for it. I am working on a Zuul Job to auto-generate the _service file, I can incorporate your changes into the zuul job when I get it working locally.
This review is the Zuul job without the _service file. https://review.opendev.org/#/c/679353/
If your fixing up the fault _service files, I realized that we should stick with .tar.gz files in opensuse that way we get better reuse of the tarball.
Sau!
_______________________________________________ Starlingx-discuss mailing list Starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io http://lists.starlingx.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/starlingx-discuss
-- Dominig ar Foll Senior Software Architect Intel Open Source Technology Centre
Hi Dominig, Just to be on the same page, Instead of using: <services> <service name="tar_scm"> We will use: <services> <service name="obs_scm"> But for this part: <service name="recompress"> <param name="compression">xz</param> <param name="file">*.tar</param> For the compression part, shouldn't we be using ".gz" as in centos? Regards, Hayde On 9/3/19, 11:36 AM, "Dominig ar Foll (Intel Open Source)" <dominig.arfoll@fridu.net> wrote: Hello, as it seems that it was a simple error, I have corrected all the concerned _service files. Please in future use obs_scm Regards Dominig On 03/09/2019 17:49, Saul Wold wrote: > > > On 9/3/19 8:37 AM, Dominig ar Foll (Intel Open Source) wrote: >> Hello, >> >> I propose to replace all the call to tar_scm which is deprecated by >> obs_scm in all _service files. >> I have done a test in my sand box and it works as before. >> Any reason why a deprecated service had been used ? > > I got this info from some wiki page, I did not realize that it was a > deprecated service. > >> Any motive to not use the current OBS source tool ? >> > Go for it. I am working on a Zuul Job to auto-generate the _service > file, I can incorporate your changes into the zuul job when I get it > working locally. > > This review is the Zuul job without the _service file. > https://review.opendev.org/#/c/679353/ > > If your fixing up the fault _service files, I realized that we should > stick with .tar.gz files in opensuse that way we get better reuse of > the tarball. > > Sau! > > _______________________________________________ > Starlingx-discuss mailing list > Starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io > http://lists.starlingx.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/starlingx-discuss -- Dominig ar Foll Senior Software Architect Intel Open Source Technology Centre _______________________________________________ Starlingx-discuss mailing list Starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io http://lists.starlingx.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/starlingx-discuss
On 9/3/19 1:08 PM, Martinez Landa, Hayde wrote:
Hi Dominig, Just to be on the same page, Instead of using: <services> <service name="tar_scm"> We will use: <services> <service name="obs_scm">
I think this is correct, but there seems to be some errors when I run it locally and on the Cloud:StarlingX project area.
But for this part: <service name="recompress"> <param name="compression">xz</param> <param name="file">*.tar</param>
For the compression part, shouldn't we be using ".gz" as in centos?
Yes, we should be using .gz for both centos and opensuse specfiles and _service files. Sau!
Regards, Hayde
On 9/3/19, 11:36 AM, "Dominig ar Foll (Intel Open Source)" <dominig.arfoll@fridu.net> wrote:
Hello,
as it seems that it was a simple error, I have corrected all the concerned _service files. Please in future use obs_scm
Regards Dominig
On 03/09/2019 17:49, Saul Wold wrote: > > > On 9/3/19 8:37 AM, Dominig ar Foll (Intel Open Source) wrote: >> Hello, >> >> I propose to replace all the call to tar_scm which is deprecated by >> obs_scm in all _service files. >> I have done a test in my sand box and it works as before. >> Any reason why a deprecated service had been used ? > > I got this info from some wiki page, I did not realize that it was a > deprecated service. > >> Any motive to not use the current OBS source tool ? >> > Go for it. I am working on a Zuul Job to auto-generate the _service > file, I can incorporate your changes into the zuul job when I get it > working locally. > > This review is the Zuul job without the _service file. > https://review.opendev.org/#/c/679353/ > > If your fixing up the fault _service files, I realized that we should > stick with .tar.gz files in opensuse that way we get better reuse of > the tarball. > > Sau! > > _______________________________________________ > Starlingx-discuss mailing list > Starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io > http://lists.starlingx.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/starlingx-discuss
-- Dominig ar Foll Senior Software Architect Intel Open Source Technology Centre
_______________________________________________ Starlingx-discuss mailing list Starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io http://lists.starlingx.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/starlingx-discuss
_______________________________________________ Starlingx-discuss mailing list Starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io http://lists.starlingx.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/starlingx-discuss
On 03/09/2019 22:47, Saul Wold wrote:
For the compression part, shouldn't we be using ".gz" as in centos?
Yes, we should be using .gz for both centos and opensuse specfiles and _service files.
Done -- Dominig ar Foll Senior Software Architect Intel Open Source Technology Centre
participants (4)
-
Dominig ar Foll (Intel Open Source)
-
Martinez Landa, Hayde
-
Rowsell, Brent
-
Saul Wold