Hi AI and Abraham, I think it is okay to add "http://vault.centos.org/centos/7.3.1611/cr/x86_64/" as one of repos for downloading those 4 missing packages. In addition, it is helpful by putting comments there to explain why this old CentOS repo (7.3.1611) is added. Regards, Yong On 26/07/2018, 2:46 AM, "Arce Moreno, Abraham" <abraham.arce.moreno@intel.com> wrote: > I don't know if this is the proper solution, but I was able to google around > and find the centos repo where some of those missing rpms are located. Thanks Al! I will leave this to our rpm experts... > http://vault.centos.org/centos/7.3.1611/cr/x86_64/ > > If I add this entry to StarlingX.repo > > [Starlingx-C7.3.1611-cr] > name=Starlingx-CentOS-7.3.1611 - cr > baseurl=http://vault.centos.org/centos/7.3.1611/cr/x86_64 > gpgcheck=1 > gpgkey=file:///etc/pki/rpm-gpg/RPM-GPG-KEY-CentOS-7 > enabled=1 > > and re-copy that to /etc/yum.repos.d/ > > then the download stage no longer complains about some of the missing > entries like python-2.7.5-58 etc.. > > I will re-run the complete download routine and see if this fixes all the > remaining (non src) issues. Is it possible you submit a patch if it works for you? Adopting the over communication approach, I am logging all the steps and output in this url [0]. Not using etherpad to have a faster edit / easy formatting. [0] https://github.com/xe1gyq/starlingx/blob/master/DeveloperGuide.md _______________________________________________ Starlingx-discuss mailing list Starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io http://lists.starlingx.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/starlingx-discuss