Re: [Starlingx-discuss] API requests: stx-fault
Hi Abraham, Thank you for your detailed analysis of fault API documents, see my replies in your email below… -----Original Message----- From: "Arce Moreno, Abraham" <abraham.arce.moreno@intel.com> To: "starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io" <starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io> Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] API requests: stx-fault Message-ID: <EB6706F7B12C4A4A8FB342855D7C5DC49D681474@FMSMSX119.amr.corp.intel.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" stx-fault team, Based in some time spent within stx-fault and with the objective to align our REST API Documentation [0] with our REST APIs, we are kindly requesting your comments for questions "?" under each section [ Section ] [Sub Section] Please assume: - The require X-Auth-Token is in place to authenticate, only URLs might be shown. - StarlingX is configured as Standard Controller: 2 Controllers, 2 Computes. [ Project Information ] When we look at the name and description reported out by curl -i http://10.10.10.2:18002/ there is a mismatch between documentation [1] and information via API Query: API Documentation: Name: stx-fault API Description: StarlingX Fault API allows for the management of physical servers. This includes inventory collection and configuration of hosts, ports, interfaces, CPUs, disk, memory, and system configuration. The API also supports the configuration of the cloud's SNMP interface. Source Code via API Query: Name: Fault Management API Description: Fault Management is an OpenStack project which provides REST API services for alarms and logs. ? Can you please let us know where the modifications are required? API Documentation or Source Code? <TL> The API document should be modified to match the description returned from API query. [ v1/ ] Here we are showing 3 different views of what we are seeing within stx-metal project: - Our initial "Migration WADL to RST", see history here [2] - What we have documented in our "Current Official API Documentation" pages [0] - What the "API Query Output" is actually showing with curl -i http://10.10.10.2:18002/v1/... [ v1/ ] [ Migration WADL to RST ] Migration analysis from WADL to RST format gave us the REST methods below to include, we are adding in the second column what it seems to be the match for the valid API endpoint name: Alarms > alarms Event Log > event_log Event Suppression > event_suppression ? Are all the names and API nodes correctly matched? <TL> Yes.
From this same output, "links" has a reference to: "http://www.windriver.com/developer/fm/dev/api-spec-v1.html"
? Does his reference needs to change to: https://docs.starlingx.io/api-ref/stx-fault/index.html <TL> Yes, you are correct. [ v1/ ] [ Current Official API Documentation ] Current Official API documentation [3] includes the following 3 REST API methods under "API Versions" v1/ details: - Alarms: http://10.10.10.2:6385/v1/alarms - Event Log: http://10.10.10.2:6385/v1/event_log - Event Suppression: http://10.10.10.2:6385/v1/event_suppression <TL> The port number is wrong here, typo? [ v1/ ] [ API Query Output ] API queries output shows these API REST methods: - alarms - event_log - event_suppression ? Do we need another level of review? <TL> No. ? Is there anything we need to take care of? <TL> No. Thanks for your initial support. [0] https://docs.starlingx.io/api-ref/stx-fault/ [1] https://docs.starlingx.io/api-ref/stx-fault/api-ref-fm-v1-fault.html?expande... [2] https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/StarlingX/Developer_Guide/API_Documentation#... [3] https://docs.starlingx.io/api-ref/stx-fault/api-ref-fm-v1-fault.html?expande... _______________________________________________ Starlingx-discuss mailing list Starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io http://lists.starlingx.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/starlingx-discuss
participants (1)
-
Liu, Tao