Agreed +1 from me. Makes sense. Thanks; Ian On 2020-03-25, 3:04 PM, "Jones, Bruce E" <bruce.e.jones@intel.com> wrote: +1 from me. Thank you for pushing this through! brucej -----Original Message----- From: Ildiko Vancsa [mailto:ildiko.vancsa@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 11:52 AM To: starlingx <starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io> Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] [tsc] Repo for CNCF landscape Hi, As the community decided to go through CNCF conformance process I have a PR open for StarlingX: https://github.com/cncf/k8s-conformance/pull/891 I got one last minor comment to fix which I wanted to confirm with you which is the following: “In order to show as open source on the Cloud Native landscape, you'd have to pick one repo to use. People normally use either the main code or an installer.” The review comment suggests the config repo (https://github.com/starlingx/config). Would the TSC and the community agree with that pick or you have another preference? Thanks, Ildikó _______________________________________________ Starlingx-discuss mailing list Starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io http://lists.starlingx.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/starlingx-discuss _______________________________________________ Starlingx-discuss mailing list Starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io http://lists.starlingx.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/starlingx-discuss