Hi Juan Carlos, You had asked "Do you know how to make the controller-0 enabled and available again in order to perform the controller swact?". In this case I believe you would need to collect and provide logs since the condition described has the appearance of a defect - one does not expect the controller to go disabled/offline due to swact.  I did not observe an existing bug report, so you could double-check and create one. M On Thu, 2019-01-03 at 19:35 +0000, Alonso, Juan Carlos wrote:

Hello,   I performed a controller swact, controller-1 become the active, then controller-0 went to disable and offline and I could not perform the swact again.   I have this output from system host-list: +----+--------------+-------------+----------------+-------------+--- -----------+ | id | hostname     | personality | administrative | operational | availability | +----+--------------+-------------+----------------+-------------+--- -----------+ | 1  | controller-0 | controller  | unlocked       | disabled    | offline      | | 2  | controller-1 | controller  | unlocked       | enabled     | available    | +----+--------------+-------------+----------------+-------------+--- -----------+   Do you know how to make the controller-0 enabled and available again in order to perform the controller swact?   Regards. Juan Carlos Alonso   _______________________________________________ Starlingx-discuss mailing list Starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io http://lists.starlingx.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/starlingx-discuss