I agree with Bart. -Jeff

On 2/22/19, 5:14 AM, "Wensley, Barton" Barton.Wensley@windriver.com wrote:

Ildikó,

I like version -01 - with the kubernetes component names. Each component is already in the "Kubernetes Components" box so you aren't losing any detail by dropping the "kube-" prefix.

For the OpenStack components, I'd lean towards using the functional names (Compute, Identity, Block Storage) instead of the code names. Anyone familiar with OpenStack will understand either, but for those less OpenStack knowledge, the functional names will be easier to understand.

Bart

-----Original Message----- From: Ildiko Vancsa [mailto:ildiko.vancsa@gmail.com] Sent: February 22, 2019 4:09 AM To: starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] Feedback needed on updated overview diagram

Hi StarlingX Community,

We are working on an updated overview diagram for StarlingX to highlight the work on containerization: https://www.dropbox.com/sh/7fz6ae9moi89e5l/AABBG5PzzJAv7BKKJ1aEdBDja?dl=0

We have two versions adding Kubernetes components to the diagram in a dedicated section and update the open source components on the bottom. The difference between the two versions is the way to refer to the Kubernetes items, -01 is using component names and -02 is using the CLI reference where applicable.

I would prefer version -01 for simplicity as well as making it clear that this is an overview diagram as opposed to a detailed architecture diagram. What do you think?

Another angle to think about is readability of the diagram for which it would be good to reduce the number of boxes with text. We could do the same approach with the OpenStack components as I described above and switch to ‘Compute’, ‘Identity’, ‘Block Storage’, etc and drop a few of the currently listed components and indicate it is not a comprehensive list. What would be your preference?

Thanks and Best Regards, Ildikó

_______________________________________________ Starlingx-discuss mailing list Starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io http://lists.starlingx.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/starlingx-discuss _______________________________________________ Starlingx-discuss mailing list Starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io http://lists.starlingx.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/starlingx-discuss

LGTM, nicely done.

-----Original Message----- From: Ildiko Vancsa [mailto:ildiko.vancsa@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2019 1:32 PM To: Gowan, Jeff Jeff.Gowan@windriver.com; Wensley, Barton Barton.Wensley@windriver.com Cc: starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io Subject: Re: [Starlingx-discuss] Feedback needed on updated overview diagram

Hi,

Thank you for the feedback.

Here is an updated diagram incorporating your comments: https://www.dropbox.com/s/0qczsc6pl55j9i4/StarlingX_Diagram_SimplifiedArchit...

Please let me know your thoughts.

Thanks, Ildikó

On 2019. Feb 22., at 21:42, Gowan, Jeff Jeff.Gowan@windriver.com wrote:

I agree with Bart. -Jeff

On 2/22/19, 5:14 AM, "Wensley, Barton" Barton.Wensley@windriver.com wrote:

Ildikó,

I like version -01 - with the kubernetes component names. Each component is already in the "Kubernetes Components" box so you aren't losing any detail by dropping the "kube-" prefix.

For the OpenStack components, I'd lean towards using the functional names (Compute, Identity, Block Storage) instead of the code names. Anyone familiar with OpenStack will understand either, but for those less OpenStack knowledge, the functional names will be easier to understand.

Bart

-----Original Message----- From: Ildiko Vancsa [mailto:ildiko.vancsa@gmail.com] Sent: February 22, 2019 4:09 AM To: starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] Feedback needed on updated overview diagram

Hi StarlingX Community,

We are working on an updated overview diagram for StarlingX to highlight the work on containerization: https://www.dropbox.com/sh/7fz6ae9moi89e5l/AABBG5PzzJAv7BKKJ1aEdBDja?dl=0

We have two versions adding Kubernetes components to the diagram in a dedicated section and update the open source components on the bottom. The difference between the two versions is the way to refer to the Kubernetes items, -01 is using component names and -02 is using the CLI reference where applicable.

I would prefer version -01 for simplicity as well as making it clear that this is an overview diagram as opposed to a detailed architecture diagram. What do you think?

Another angle to think about is readability of the diagram for which it would be good to reduce the number of boxes with text. We could do the same approach with the OpenStack components as I described above and switch to ‘Compute’, ‘Identity’, ‘Block Storage’, etc and drop a few of the currently listed components and indicate it is not a comprehensive list. What would be your preference?

Thanks and Best Regards, Ildikó

---

Starlingx-discuss mailing list Starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io http://lists.starlingx.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/starlingx-discuss _______________________________________________ Starlingx-discuss mailing list Starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io http://lists.starlingx.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/starlingx-discuss

_______________________________________________ Starlingx-discuss mailing list Starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io http://lists.starlingx.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/starlingx-discuss

LGTM.

Thanks,

Brent

-----Original Message----- From: Ildiko Vancsa [mailto:ildiko.vancsa@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2019 4:32 PM To: Gowan, Jeff Jeff.Gowan@windriver.com; Wensley, Barton Barton.Wensley@windriver.com Cc: starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io Subject: Re: [Starlingx-discuss] Feedback needed on updated overview diagram

Hi,

Thank you for the feedback.

Here is an updated diagram incorporating your comments: https://www.dropbox.com/s/0qczsc6pl55j9i4/StarlingX_Diagram_SimplifiedArchit...

Please let me know your thoughts.

Thanks, Ildikó

On 2019. Feb 22., at 21:42, Gowan, Jeff Jeff.Gowan@windriver.com wrote:

I agree with Bart. -Jeff

On 2/22/19, 5:14 AM, "Wensley, Barton" Barton.Wensley@windriver.com wrote:

Ildikó,

I like version -01 - with the kubernetes component names. Each component is already in the "Kubernetes Components" box so you aren't losing any detail by dropping the "kube-" prefix.

For the OpenStack components, I'd lean towards using the functional names (Compute, Identity, Block Storage) instead of the code names. Anyone familiar with OpenStack will understand either, but for those less OpenStack knowledge, the functional names will be easier to understand.

Bart

-----Original Message----- From: Ildiko Vancsa [mailto:ildiko.vancsa@gmail.com] Sent: February 22, 2019 4:09 AM To: starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] Feedback needed on updated overview diagram

Hi StarlingX Community,

We are working on an updated overview diagram for StarlingX to highlight the work on containerization: https://www.dropbox.com/sh/7fz6ae9moi89e5l/AABBG5PzzJAv7BKKJ1aEdBDja?dl=0

We have two versions adding Kubernetes components to the diagram in a dedicated section and update the open source components on the bottom. The difference between the two versions is the way to refer to the Kubernetes items, -01 is using component names and -02 is using the CLI reference where applicable.

I would prefer version -01 for simplicity as well as making it clear that this is an overview diagram as opposed to a detailed architecture diagram. What do you think?

Another angle to think about is readability of the diagram for which it would be good to reduce the number of boxes with text. We could do the same approach with the OpenStack components as I described above and switch to ‘Compute’, ‘Identity’, ‘Block Storage’, etc and drop a few of the currently listed components and indicate it is not a comprehensive list. What would be your preference?

Thanks and Best Regards, Ildikó

---

Starlingx-discuss mailing list Starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io http://lists.starlingx.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/starlingx-discuss _______________________________________________ Starlingx-discuss mailing list Starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io http://lists.starlingx.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/starlingx-discuss

_______________________________________________ Starlingx-discuss mailing list Starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io http://lists.starlingx.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/starlingx-discuss