[Starlingx-discuss] rebuild or upgrade the 9 RPM/sRPM in the 3rd party list
Saul Wold
sgw at linux.intel.com
Wed Aug 8 15:16:22 UTC 2018
On 08/08/2018 07:45 AM, Rowsell, Brent wrote:
> Cindy,
>
> What is the objective of this initiative ?
>
Brent,
The idea as mentioned in the past is to remove this set of packages that
are coming from non-CentOS repos. This way we can reduce where we are
finding (or not finding) some set of RPMs and make the build more
consistent.
6 of 9 are python based.
Kubernetes has a proposed fix.
influxdb is the most problematic as it's a binary being served from s3,
yes signed, but it would be better if either it was built during the
build process (short term) or StarlingX project built it (longer term).
Sau!
> Thanks,
>
> Brent
>
> *From:* Xie, Cindy [mailto:cindy.xie at intel.com]
> *Sent:* Wednesday, August 8, 2018 10:43 AM
> *To:* starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io
> *Subject:* [Starlingx-discuss] rebuild or upgrade the 9 RPM/sRPM in the
> 3rd party list
>
> All,
>
> We talked about the 9 RPM/sRPM in:
> https://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/stx-tools/tree/centos-mirror-tools/rpms_from_3rd_parties.lst
>
> I submitted 5 stories and please comments on the way to handle them:
>
> -https://storyboard.openstack.org/#!/story/2003339
>
> -https://storyboard.openstack.org/#!/story/2003340
>
> -https://storyboard.openstack.org/#!/story/2003341
>
> -https://storyboard.openstack.org/#!/story/2003342
>
> -https://storyboard.openstack.org/#!/story/2003357
>
> @chuy is building the RPMs from Intel Koji, please add the status into
> the stories as well. So we can make decision if we want to upgrade or to
> re-build them.
>
> Thx. - cindy
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Starlingx-discuss mailing list
> Starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io
> http://lists.starlingx.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/starlingx-discuss
>
More information about the Starlingx-discuss
mailing list