[Starlingx-discuss] patches for SRPM upgrade to CentOS 7.5

[Scott Little]

One other concern.

I'm surprised that there aren't more patches being refactored in the 
inspections seen so far.  When I've done this job in the past, it was my 
policy that our patches apply cleanly with no 'fuzz'.

Scott


On 18-08-14 09:21 AM, Scott Little wrote:
> On rare occasions it can produce an issue.  Would likely requires a 
> case where our patches modify a -devel rpm in a way that changes how 
> other packages compile.
>
> While I'd prefer to see the competing binary rpms removed sooner 
> rather than later, I can settle on a follow up story.
>
> Scott
>
>
> On 18-08-14 07:38 AM, Lin, Shuicheng wrote:
>>
>> Hi Scott,
>>
>> I created below story to track the rpm compete you mentioned in 
>> comments. I prefer to do it after CentOS7.5 upgrade, since it is a 
>> minor refine, not an issue fix.
>>
>> Is my understand correct?
>>
>> https://storyboard.openstack.org/#!/story/2003435 
>> <https://storyboard.openstack.org/#%21/story/2003435>
>>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Starlingx-discuss mailing list
> Starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io
> http://lists.starlingx.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/starlingx-discuss


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.starlingx.io/pipermail/starlingx-discuss/attachments/20180814/5bb78a2f/attachment.html>