[Starlingx-discuss] Request for clarification related to gcc 8

[Young, Ken]

Cindy,

At a higher level, what are the plans for gcc 8?  Is this really part of the security strategy or part of moving the OS forward?  All this needs to be discussed as we kick off the work in the security group's efforts.  Right now, all the work feels adhoc.

Regards,
Ken Y

On 2018-08-21, 8:23 PM, "Xie, Cindy" <cindy.xie at intel.com> wrote:

    Both shall be tagged with "stx-security" bug in my opinion.
    
    Thx. - cindy
    
    -----Original Message-----
    From: Chris Friesen [mailto:chris.friesen at windriver.com] 
    Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2018 5:08 AM
    To: Eslimi, Dariush <Dariush.Eslimi at windriver.com>; starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io
    Subject: Re: [Starlingx-discuss] Request for clarification related to gcc 8
    
    On 08/21/2018 01:26 PM, Eslimi, Dariush wrote:
    > If that is case Chris, then title of the bug should not be : "fm-common cannot be built with GCC 8 due to string bound checks"
    
    Title has been changed.  It is now:
    
    [Bug] GCC 8 highlights potentially-risky strncpy() usage in fm-common
    
    
    Chris
    
    _______________________________________________
    Starlingx-discuss mailing list
    Starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io
    http://lists.starlingx.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/starlingx-discuss
    _______________________________________________
    Starlingx-discuss mailing list
    Starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io
    http://lists.starlingx.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/starlingx-discuss