[Starlingx-discuss] Analysis of patch 4ae5a58 for StartlingX upstreaming

[Xu, Chenjie]

Hi Matt,
Thank you for your information!

Best Regards,
Xu, Chenjie

From: Peters, Matt [mailto:Matt.Peters at windriver.com]
Sent: Saturday, December 8, 2018 1:21 AM
To: Xu, Chenjie <chenjie.xu at intel.com>
Cc: starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io
Subject: Re: Analysis of patch 4ae5a58 for StartlingX upstreaming

Hello Chenjie,
The plan is to upstream this to the respective projects (networking-bgpvpn and neutron-dyanmic-routing).  However, in the short term this is not being prioritized nor has any attempt been made to approach the individual project teams about getting this accepted.

-Matt

From: "Xu, Chenjie" <chenjie.xu at intel.com<mailto:chenjie.xu at intel.com>>
Date: Friday, December 7, 2018 at 9:30 AM
To: "Peters, Matt" <Matt.Peters at windriver.com<mailto:Matt.Peters at windriver.com>>
Cc: "starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io<mailto:starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io>" <starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io<mailto:starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io>>
Subject: Analysis of patch 4ae5a58 for StartlingX upstreaming

Hi Matt,
Will the change in BGPVPN upstream? The code to use the RFE “Enable other subprojects to extend l2pop fdbs”.

Best Regards,
Xu, Chenjie

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.starlingx.io/pipermail/starlingx-discuss/attachments/20181210/f4e320bf/attachment-0001.html>