[Starlingx-discuss] Deployment Improvements Proposal

[Peters, Matt]

See inline.

From: "Wang, Yi C" <yi.c.wang at intel.com>
Date: Friday, December 14, 2018 at 3:53 AM
To: "Peters, Matt" <Matt.Peters at windriver.com>
Cc: "starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io" <starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io>
Subject: RE: Deployment Improvements Proposal

Hi Matt,

I just went through your slides. And I have a few questions. I appreciate if you can share more information about your proposal. Many thanks!

1. We know config_controller will do many things, like bootstrap configuration and controller configuration together with required hieradata generation. All the jobs of config_controller will be  taken over by Ansible, or just part of them?
MP> Yes most of these tasks will be handled by the Ansible playbook.  However, much of the existing capabilities may be leveraged in the implementation to avoid re-writing everything.  The details will be outlined in the forthcoming spec.

2. Does WindRiver has plan to replace Puppet with Ansible for all configuration jobs in the future?
MP> There are no specific plans to replace Puppet for all configuration management.  However, there are several features being actively developed in StarlingX that will be changing the existing Puppet manifests (e.g. OpenStack Containerization).

3. For the first controller, we still need local execution of Ansible playbook for initial bootstrap. Is my understanding correct?
MP> This is one of the main drivers for changing some of the existing config_controller and Puppet manifest handling.  The operator will have the ability to run the Ansible playbook locally or remotely.

BR.
Yi
From: Peters, Matt [mailto:Matt.Peters at windriver.com]
Sent: Friday, December 14, 2018 3:11 AM
To: starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io
Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] Deployment Improvements Proposal

Hello,
Attached are the slides I presented during the TSC call on Dec 13, 2018 for the proposed improvements to the StarlingX initial bootstrap and system inventory.  As indicated on the call, a detailed stx-spec will follow, but wanted to share the high-level changes being proposed before the arrival of the spec to get some early feedback.

Regards, Matt

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.starlingx.io/pipermail/starlingx-discuss/attachments/20181214/feec4059/attachment.html>