[Starlingx-discuss] Restructuring round 2
Scott Little
scott.little at windriver.com
Tue Jul 17 19:10:49 UTC 2018
On 18-07-17 12:38 PM, Saul Wold wrote:
>
> Scott,
>
> Thanks for getting started on this. As you may know I worked on the
> Yocto Project and worked on the initial split that you mention came
> from WRLinux.
>
> I think you have done a good job with the reorganization. As I am
> just coming up to speed I might have a couple of dumb questions to as
> ask I don't know of all the content changes yet (Patches, config
> changes, ...).
>
> A simple high level question, would it make sense to segregate out
> everything that is CentOS into base? That way as we move to more of
> an OS independent setup, the core directory could possibly go away?
[SL] We were envisioning function rather than upstream source as the
reason for the categories. 'Base' are those packages that are pretty
much universal to a Linux server.
>
> Can you add some definition as the what belongs in some of the other
> directories (config vs config-files, tools vs utilities)?
[SL] Tools vs utilities. Not clear I'll admit. Utilities are small,
special purpose, shortcuts that could otherwise be accomplished by the
right set of CLI commands.
Tools are bigger, more complex, e.g. investigating and analyze the state
of the system.
>
> See more direct questions inline in the lists below.
>
> Do you have a full "after" list, that might help then just seeing
> what's being relocated.
[SL] will send seperately
>
> Thanks
> Sau!
>
>
> On 07/17/2018 08:07 AM, Scott Little wrote:
>> Story: https://storyboard.openstack.org/#!/story/2002801
>>
>> *Goals:*
>>
>> 1) Consolidate the following repo’s under stx-integ.
>> • stx-gplv2
>> • stx-gplv3
>> • stx-utils
>>
>> 2) Restructure the directories under which packages are to be found.
>>
>> Currently stx-gplv2/3 are largely without structure. Parts of the
>> stx-integ structure were inherited from WRLinux and make little
>> sense. stx-utils is just i mess of stuff that never found a home
>> when StarlingX was first set up.
>>
>> Directories should descriptive of the class of packages to be found
>> within.
>>
>> Intent is to preserve update history as best is is possible.
>>
>>
>> *Timeline: *
>>
>> Probably around July 23 unless there are strong objections. We
>> should probably have a freeze on submissions to the affected repos
>> until it is all completed.
>>
>>
>> *Code Reviews: *
>>
>> Most of this is just moving code around. A few path corrections, but
>> no new code. The number and size of the reviews will be huge, and
>> the code should all have been inspected once before. Is there a way
>> to fast track this? Would there be strong objections to me just doing
>> a +2/+1 without waiting for independent review?
>>
>>
>> *Details of directories/groups ...*
>>
>>
>> Create new directories under stx-integ (logical groupings for files):
>> ceph
>> config
>> config-files
>> database
>> filesystem
>> filesystem/drbd
>> grub
>> kernel
>> kernel/kernel-modules
>> ldap
>> logging
>> strorage-drivers
>> tools
>> utilities
>> virt
>>
>> Retained directories under stx-integ (additional logical groupings
>> for files):
>> base
>> mellanox
>> monitoring
>> networking
>> python
>> restapi-doc
>> security
>>
>> Retire directories under stx-integ (non-descriptive or ambiguous
>> grouping we will retire):
>> connectivity
>> core
>> devtools
>> extended
>> support
>>
>>
>> *Details of packages ...*
>>
>> Relocated packages (internal to stx-integ):
>> base/
>> dhcp
>> initscripts
>> libevent
>> lighttpd
>> memcached
>> net-snmp
>> novnc
>> ntp
>> openssh
>> pam
>> procps
>> sanlock
>> shadow
>> sudo
>> systemd
>> util-linux
>> vim
>> watchdog
>>
>> ceph/
>> python-cephclient
>>
>> config/
>> e2fsprogs
> Why e2fsprogs in config vs base?
[SL] error on my part. Some sort of cut-n-paste error.
config/
facter
puppet-4.8.2
puppet-modules
filesystem/
e2fsprogs
nfs-utils
nfscheck
>
>> facter
>> nfs-utils
> Same here base?
>> nfscheck
>> puppet-4.8.2
>> puppet-modules
>>
>> kernel/
>> kernel-std
>> kernel-rt
>>
>> kernel/kernel-modules/
>> mlnx-ofa_kernel
>>
>> ldap/
>> nss-pam-ldapd
>> openldap
>>
>> logging/
>> syslog-ng
>> logrotate
> With just 2 items maybe base as they are part of CentOS?
[SL] additional packages might land here that filter/manipulate/look for
trends in logs
>
>>
>> networking/
>> lldpd
>> iproute
> I could see this one both ways it's one item that could be part of base.
>
>> mellanox
>> python-ryu
>> mlx4-config
>>
>> python/
>> python-2.7.5
>> python-django
>> python-gunicorn
>> python-setuptools
>> python-smartpm
>>
>> security/
>> shim-signed
>> shim-unsigned
>> tboot
>>
>> strorage-drivers/
>> python-3parclient
>> python-lefthandclient
>>
>> virt/
>> cloud-init
>> libvirt
>> libvirt-python
>> qemu
>>
>> tools/
>> storage-topology
>> vm-topology
>>
>> utilities/
>> tis-extensions
>> namespace-utils
>> nova-utils
>> update-motd
>>
>>
>>
>> Relocated packages (stx-utils to stx-update):
>> enable-dev-patch
>>
>>
>>
>> Relocated packages (stx-utils to stx-integ):
>>
>> config-files/
>> io-scheduler
>>
>> filesystem/
>> filesystem-scripts
>>
>> grub/
>> grubby
>>
>> logging/
>> logmgmt
>>
>> tools/
>> collector
>> monitor-tools
>>
>> tools/engtools/
>> hostdata-collectors
>> parsers
>>
>> utilities/
>> build-info
>> branding (formerly wrs-branding)
>> platform-util
>>
>>
>>
>> Relocated packages (stx-gpl2 to stx-integ):
>> base/
>> bash
>> cgcs-users
>> cluster-resource-agents
>> dpkg
>> haproxy
>> libfdt
>> netpbm
>> rpm
>>
>> database/
>> mariadb
>>
>> filesystem/
>> iscsi-initiator-utils
>>
>> filesystem/drbd/
>> drbd-tools
>>
>> kernel/kernel-modules/
>> drbd
>> integrity
>> intel-e1000e
>> intel-i40e
>> intel-i40evf
>> intel-ixgbe
>> intel-ixgbevf
>> qat17
>> tpmdd
>>
>> ldap/
>> ldapscripts
>>
>> networking/
>> iptables
>> net-tools
>>
>>
>>
>> Relocated packages (stx-gpl3 to stx-integ):
>> base/
>> anaconda
>> crontabs
>> dnsmasq
>> rsync
>>
>> database/
>> python-psycopg2
>>
>> filesystem/
>> parted
>>
>> grub/
>> grub2
>>
>> security/
>> python-keyring
>>
>>
>>
>> Delete two packages from stx-integ:
>> tgt
>> irqbalance
>>
>> Delete two packages from stx-gplv3:
>> seabios
>> sysvinit
>>
>> Delete one package from stx-utils:
>> io-monitor
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Starlingx-discuss mailing list
>> Starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io
>> http://lists.starlingx.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/starlingx-discuss
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Starlingx-discuss mailing list
> Starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io
> http://lists.starlingx.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/starlingx-discuss
More information about the Starlingx-discuss
mailing list