[Starlingx-discuss] Repo consolidation

[Rowsell, Brent]

I don't understand the distinction. There is already gpl code in stx_integ.

Brent

From: Jones, Bruce E [mailto:bruce.e.jones at intel.com]
Sent: Wednesday, June 13, 2018 1:29 PM
To: Rowsell, Brent <Brent.Rowsell at windriver.com>; starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io
Cc: AMBARDEKAR, PRANJAL <pranjal.ambardekar at intel.com>
Subject: RE: [Starlingx-discuss] Repo consolidation

Objection.  We separated those out to comply with software license checking tools that we will still need to run.

Pranjal and Abraham are the subject matter experts here.  If there is a way to pass the code scanning tools and still combine these, I would not object at all.

      brucej

From: Rowsell, Brent [mailto:Brent.Rowsell at windriver.com]
Sent: Wednesday, June 13, 2018 10:22 AM
To: starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io<mailto:starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io>
Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] Repo consolidation

I would like to propose that the following repo's be consolidated under stx-integ.


*         stx-gplv2

*         stx-gplv3

*         stx-upstream

Any objections/comments ?

Brent

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.starlingx.io/pipermail/starlingx-discuss/attachments/20180613/ecc5a74f/attachment.html>