[Starlingx-discuss] Missing "Lighttpd-1.4.50-1.el7.src.rpm" Package Re: Starlingx-discuss Digest, Vol 6, Issue 3

Fri Nov 2 20:19:33 UTC 2018

You can find it here ...

http://mirror.starlingx.cengn.ca/mirror/centos/epel/dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/epel/7/SRPMS/Packages/l/lighttpd-1.4.50-1.el7.src.rpm

On 18-11-02 02:16 PM, Cordoba Malibran, Erich wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Since yesterday it seems that the lighttpd version was upgraded in the upstream server. This means that your
> mirror is incomplete and that is why you are seeing that failure.
>
>  From other thread in the mailing:
> I could find the src rpm with below repo (./centos-mirror-tools/yum.repos.d/StarlingX-EPEL-7.repo).
> Could you help double check it?
>
> [slin14 at eb7345575ec1 cgcs-root]$ sudo -E yumdownloader -C --url --source lighttpd-1.4.50-1.el7
> https://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/epel/7/SRPMS/Packages/l/lighttpd-1.4.50-1.el7.src.rpm
>
> So, you can try the following:
>
> - Download the missing file manually
> - Update the cgcs-centos-repo symlinks. Just run generate-cgcs-centos-repo.sh <path/to/mirror>
> - Try to build again.
>
> We hope to fix this issue in the next days.
>
> -Erich
>
> From: Pongsawat Payungwong <pongsawat at sysware.asia>
> Date: Friday, November 2, 2018 at 7:05 AM
> To: "starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io" <starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io>
> Cc: "Einarsson, Jim" <Jim.Einarsson at windriver.com>
> Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] Missing "Lighttpd-1.4.50-1.el7.src.rpm" Package Re: Starlingx-discuss Digest, Vol 6, Issue 3
>
> Hi Team,
>   I would like to get some advice for mirror:Source/lighttpd-1.4.50-1.el7.src.rpm   ,  We are from Thailand, Bangkok, trying to build starlingx ISO image on Supermicro Server, [4SSDx1TB, 256Gb Ram, 4x10GE], follow everything on document step but missing  "lighttpd-1.4.50-1.el7.src.rpm', ,  It download from mirror centos repo from ASIA region...
> I saw similar "lighttpd" issue in this email thread as well but not sure same with my issue or not.
>
> We can't   "$build pkgs "   error as below..
> ----Excerpt----
> 16:52:40 b0: ===== Build SRPM for 'python-cephclient' =====
> 16:52:40 b0: PKG_BASE=/localdisk/designer/swthadmin/starlingx/cgcs-root/stx/stx-integ/ceph/python-cephclient
> 16:52:40 b0: WORK_BASE=/localdisk/loadbuild/swthadmin/starlingx/std/inputs/stx/stx-integ/ceph/python-cephclient
> 16:52:40 b0: RPMBUILD_BASE=/localdisk/loadbuild/swthadmin/starlingx/std/inputs/stx/stx-integ/ceph/python-cephclient/rpmbuild
> 16:52:40 b0: Wrote: /localdisk/loadbuild/swthadmin/starlingx/std/rpmbuild/SOURCES/python-cephclient/srpm_input.md5
> 16:52:40 b0: SRPM build not required for '/localdisk/designer/swthadmin/starlingx/cgcs-root/stx/stx-integ/ceph/python-cephclient'
> 16:52:40 b0: ===== Build complete for 'python-cephclient' =====
> 16:52:40 b0:
> 16:52:40 ============ Build failed =============
> 16:52:40 b0: ERROR: build_dir (415): Invalid srpm path 'mirror:Source/lighttpd-1.4.50-1.el7.src.rpm', evaluated as '/localdisk/designer/swthadmin/starlingx/cgcs-root/cgcs-centos-repo/Source/lighttpd-1.4.50-1.el7.src.rpm', found in '/localdisk/designer/swthadmin/starlingx/cgcs-root/stx/stx-integ/base/lighttpd/centos/srpm_path'
> 16:52:40 ERROR: reaper (1302): Failed to build src.rpm from source at 'b0'
> 16:52:40
>
> ######## Thu Nov  1 16:52:40 UTC 2018: build-srpm-parallel --std failed with rc=1
>
> Thu Nov  1 16:52:40 UTC 2018: build-srpm-parallel --std failed with rc=1
>
> ----------end-------------------
>
>
> Any advice are welcome.
>
> --
> Warmest Regards,
> Pongsawat P
> Sysware Technology (Thailand)
>
> On Fri, Nov 2, 2018 at 5:38 AM <mailto:starlingx-discuss-request at lists.starlingx.io> wrote:
> Send Starlingx-discuss mailing list submissions to
>          mailto:starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>          http://lists.starlingx.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/starlingx-discuss
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>          mailto:starlingx-discuss-request at lists.starlingx.io
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
>          mailto:starlingx-discuss-owner at lists.starlingx.io
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of Starlingx-discuss digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
>     1. Re: Automated Notification for: [mirror-downloader][#119]
>        Missing packages - Results report (Cordoba Malibran, Erich)
>     2. Re: Automated Notification for: [mirror-downloader][#119]
>        Missing packages - Results report (Xie, Cindy)
>     3. Re: Automated Notification for: [mirror-downloader][#119]
>        Missing packages - Results report (Rowsell, Brent)
>     4. Re: Compute boot-loop (von Hoesslin, Volker)
>     5. Re: Compute boot-loop (Michel Thebeau)
>     6. Re: Propose OpenStack/Apmec to StarlingX like an upstream
>        component (Dean Troyer)
>     7. Re: Compute boot-loop (Alonso, Juan Carlos)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Thu, 1 Nov 2018 13:11:37 +0000
> From: "Cordoba Malibran, Erich" <mailto:erich.cordoba.malibran at intel.com>
> To: "mailto:starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io"
>          <mailto:starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io>
> Subject: Re: [Starlingx-discuss] Automated Notification for:
>          [mirror-downloader][#119] Missing packages - Results report
> Message-ID: <mailto:4EA80D98-75AF-4DB1-A6B4-9ED5FAC99FC6 at intel.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
> Lighttpd was upgraded in upstream:
>
> Package lighttpd-1.4.50-1.el7.src not found, available lighttpd-1.4.51-1.el7.src
>
> We'll send a patch for master today. Should we backport this to r/2018.10 branch?
>
> -Erich
>
> On 11/1/18, 3:37 AM, "mailto:aragorn at intel.com" <mailto:aragorn at intel.com> wrote:
>
>      [mirror-downloader][#119] Missing packages. Results report:
>       - Missing: logs/L1_srpms_missing_centos.log
>      lighttpd-1.4.50-1.el7.src.rpm - Missing GPG key:
>      ./output/stx-r1/CentOS/pike/Source/libvirt-python-4.7.0-1.fc28.src.rpm: RSA sha1 ((MD5) PGP) md5 NOT OK (MISSING KEYS: (MD5) PGP#596bea5d)
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Thu, 1 Nov 2018 13:53:00 +0000
> From: "Xie, Cindy" <mailto:cindy.xie at intel.com>
> To: "Cordoba Malibran, Erich" <mailto:erich.cordoba.malibran at intel.com>,
>          "mailto:starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io"
>          <mailto:starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io>, "Liu, ZhipengS"
>          <mailto:zhipengs.liu at intel.com>
> Subject: Re: [Starlingx-discuss] Automated Notification for:
>          [mirror-downloader][#119] Missing packages - Results report
> Message-ID:
>          <mailto:2FD5DDB5A04D264C80D42CA35194914F35DB1360 at SHSMSX104.ccr.corp.intel.com>
>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
> + Zhipeng
> We still have patches on lighttpd and it was rebased to 1.4.50 recently by Zhipeng. If the srpm upgraded to 1.4.51, Zhipeng can you please work w/ Erich and see if those patches need rework?
>
> Thx. - cindy
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Cordoba Malibran, Erich [mailto:mailto:erich.cordoba.malibran at intel.com]
> Sent: Thursday, November 1, 2018 6:12 AM
> To: mailto:starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io
> Subject: Re: [Starlingx-discuss] Automated Notification for: [mirror-downloader][#119] Missing packages - Results report
>
> Lighttpd was upgraded in upstream:
>
> Package lighttpd-1.4.50-1.el7.src not found, available lighttpd-1.4.51-1.el7.src
>
> We'll send a patch for master today. Should we backport this to r/2018.10 branch?
>
> -Erich
>
> On 11/1/18, 3:37 AM, "mailto:aragorn at intel.com" <mailto:aragorn at intel.com> wrote:
>
>      [mirror-downloader][#119] Missing packages. Results report:
>       - Missing: logs/L1_srpms_missing_centos.log
>      lighttpd-1.4.50-1.el7.src.rpm - Missing GPG key:
>      ./output/stx-r1/CentOS/pike/Source/libvirt-python-4.7.0-1.fc28.src.rpm: RSA sha1 ((MD5) PGP) md5 NOT OK (MISSING KEYS: (MD5) PGP#596bea5d)
>
> _______________________________________________
> Starlingx-discuss mailing list
> mailto:Starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io
> http://lists.starlingx.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/starlingx-discuss
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 3
> Date: Thu, 1 Nov 2018 13:55:36 +0000
> From: "Rowsell, Brent" <mailto:Brent.Rowsell at windriver.com>
> To: "Xie, Cindy" <mailto:cindy.xie at intel.com>, "Cordoba Malibran, Erich"
>          <mailto:erich.cordoba.malibran at intel.com>,
>          "mailto:starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io"
>          <mailto:starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io>, "Liu, ZhipengS"
>          <mailto:zhipengs.liu at intel.com>
> Subject: Re: [Starlingx-discuss] Automated Notification for:
>          [mirror-downloader][#119] Missing packages - Results report
> Message-ID:
>          <mailto:2588653EBDFFA34B982FAF00F1B4844EBB2F0821 at ALA-MBD.corp.ad.wrs.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
> This needs to be functionally tested before it is pushed.
>
> Brent
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Xie, Cindy [mailto:mailto:cindy.xie at intel.com]
> Sent: Thursday, November 1, 2018 9:53 AM
> To: Cordoba Malibran, Erich <mailto:erich.cordoba.malibran at intel.com>; mailto:starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io; Liu, ZhipengS <mailto:zhipengs.liu at intel.com>
> Subject: Re: [Starlingx-discuss] Automated Notification for: [mirror-downloader][#119] Missing packages - Results report
>
> + Zhipeng
> We still have patches on lighttpd and it was rebased to 1.4.50 recently by Zhipeng. If the srpm upgraded to 1.4.51, Zhipeng can you please work w/ Erich and see if those patches need rework?
>
> Thx. - cindy
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Cordoba Malibran, Erich [mailto:mailto:erich.cordoba.malibran at intel.com]
> Sent: Thursday, November 1, 2018 6:12 AM
> To: mailto:starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io
> Subject: Re: [Starlingx-discuss] Automated Notification for: [mirror-downloader][#119] Missing packages - Results report
>
> Lighttpd was upgraded in upstream:
>
> Package lighttpd-1.4.50-1.el7.src not found, available lighttpd-1.4.51-1.el7.src
>
> We'll send a patch for master today. Should we backport this to r/2018.10 branch?
>
> -Erich
>
> On 11/1/18, 3:37 AM, "mailto:aragorn at intel.com" <mailto:aragorn at intel.com> wrote:
>
>      [mirror-downloader][#119] Missing packages. Results report:
>       - Missing: logs/L1_srpms_missing_centos.log
>      lighttpd-1.4.50-1.el7.src.rpm - Missing GPG key:
>      ./output/stx-r1/CentOS/pike/Source/libvirt-python-4.7.0-1.fc28.src.rpm: RSA sha1 ((MD5) PGP) md5 NOT OK (MISSING KEYS: (MD5) PGP#596bea5d)
>
> _______________________________________________
> Starlingx-discuss mailing list
> mailto:Starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io
> http://lists.starlingx.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/starlingx-discuss
> _______________________________________________
> Starlingx-discuss mailing list
> mailto:Starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io
> http://lists.starlingx.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/starlingx-discuss
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 4
> Date: Thu, 1 Nov 2018 16:12:26 +0000
> From: "von Hoesslin, Volker" <mailto:Volker.Hoesslin at swsn.de>
> To: "'mailto:starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io'"
>          <mailto:starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io>
> Subject: Re: [Starlingx-discuss] Compute boot-loop
> Message-ID: <mailto:DB39DAB5F762704A93D316F9CE7D021E4280986F at emilio.sis.net>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
> Maybe it helps: https://ibb.co/n2OgoL
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> Hello, there,
> i have now built a complete stack and believe i did everything right. after unlocking the compute nodes (two pieces), the nodes come into an endless boot loop.
> Error messages are not really noticeable, except:
> compute-X 'ceilometer-polling' process has failed. Auto recovery in progress
>
> any suggestions? Greez & thx, volker...
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <http://lists.starlingx.io/pipermail/starlingx-discuss/attachments/20181101/23258d92/attachment-0001.html>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 5
> Date: Thu, 1 Nov 2018 12:28:53 -0400
> From: Michel Thebeau <mailto:michel.thebeau at windriver.com>
> To: "von Hoesslin, Volker" <mailto:Volker.Hoesslin at swsn.de>,
>          "'mailto:starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io'"
>          <mailto:starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io>
> Subject: Re: [Starlingx-discuss] Compute boot-loop
> Message-ID: <mailto:1e1ebab5-998b-3c27-fc68-4360e148315f at windriver.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format=flowed
>
> Hi Volker,
>
> Could you describe the instructions you were using to setup startlingx
> (were you following a wiki online)?  Did you recheck the instructions
> versus what is actually configured on the computes?
>
> How many cpus do your computes have?
>
> Which build are you using?  Did you build your own?
>
> When reboot-loop happens on a node often the error will be presented on
> the console during boot or could be inferred from console, sometimes
> referring to puppet logs of the node /var/log/puppet/
>
> M
>
>
> On 2018-11-01 6:45 a.m., von Hoesslin, Volker wrote:
>> Hello, there,
>> i have now built a complete stack and believe i did everything right. after unlocking the compute nodes (two pieces), the nodes come into an endless boot loop.
>> Error messages are not really noticeable, except:
>> compute-X 'ceilometer-polling' process has failed. Auto recovery in progress
>>
>> any suggestions? Greez & thx, volker...
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Starlingx-discuss mailing list
>> mailto:Starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io
>> http://lists.starlingx.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/starlingx-discuss
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 6
> Date: Thu, 1 Nov 2018 12:16:18 -0500
> From: Dean Troyer <mailto:dtroyer at gmail.com>
> To: mailto:doantungbk.203 at gmail.com
> Cc: mailto:starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io
> Subject: Re: [Starlingx-discuss] Propose OpenStack/Apmec to StarlingX
>          like an upstream component
> Message-ID:
>          <mailto:CAOJFoEuSxPNOQto5oVmmFVP+zDtcKq0+oUXDP36W+hG6A1RjNA at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
>
> On Thu, Nov 1, 2018 at 7:44 AM Tung Doan <mailto:doantungbk.203 at gmail.com> wrote:
>> I am Tung Doan - An OpenStack contributor and the PTL of OpenStack/Apmec project. Since we acknowledged the potential integration between Apmec and StarlingX, I am writing this email to propose adding OpenStack/Apmec to StarlingX like an upstream project.
>>
>> Project description: OpenStack Apmec [1] stands for the Automated Provisioning Framework for Multi-access Edge Computing which is the first orchestration and management framework dedicated to the MEC services in OpenStack. Below are some of the outstanding features of Apmec project:
> I believe Apmec is not an official OpenStack project (as listed in
> [0]), do you have plans to apply to become an official OpenStack
> project under TC governance?  (Until then you do need to be careful
> about referring to Apmec as 'an OpenStack project', it is hosted by
> OpenStack, but is not (yet?) an OpenStack project.)
>
>> - no need to take care of the NFV functionalities. Since existing NFV MANO frameworks (Tacker, ONAP, OSM, OpenBaton,...) are diverse, integrating them can make StarlingX complicated. Apmec was designed to take over responsibility for integrating them since the delivery of MEC services is our critical mission.
> Is this replacing existing StarlingX functionality?
>
>>    - no need to take care of the life-cycle management of the MEC applications. Apmec offers API to help StarlingX perform this function.  As mentioned earlier, Apmec is OpenStack project, therefore, to provide low-latency for MEC applications,  Apmec is also planned to support acceleration technologies (e.g, integrated with OpenStack Cyborg) such as DPDK and FPGA.
> Can you get more specific about what the integration with StarlingX looks like?
>
> dt
>
> [0] https://governance.openstack.org/tc/reference/projects/index.html
>