[Starlingx-discuss] TLs to sign off on initial core reviewer groups - ACTION NEEDED

Scott Little scott.little at windriver.com
Wed Nov 7 18:21:45 UTC 2018


I wasn't complaining. Just wanted to make sure it was all intentional.  
It was strange to have +2 power for one iteration of a review, but not 
the next.


PS.   If the Koji train starts building momentum, there will be a lot 
more restructuring work to do.  A lot more gits to manage. It'll be 

On 18-11-07 12:25 PM, Dean Troyer wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 7, 2018 at 9:58 AM Scott Little <scott.little at windriver.com> wrote:
>> Actually I had pretty broad +2/+1 power to most repos, at least
>> initially, to facilitate repo creation and restructuring.  Roughly on
>> par with Dean.  I wasn't that I was a core reviewer in the normal
>> sense.  Just a backup to Dean that can do some of the structural work.
>> If I'm being demoted, fine, as long as that was the intent.
> The intent was to get the right people with the responsibility into
> the right groups.  FWIW I no longer have +2 in any of the code repos
> in Gerrit [0] now that we're basically up and running.  The TL's have
> management of their groups and enough people know their way around to
> fix the things I needed to handle in the beginning that I can let go
> there.
> In emergency cases where core team members may be unavailable we have
> the OpenStack Infrastructure team to turn to for help in IRC
> #openstack-infra.
> dt
> [0] Just docs, specs and release now.  This is a Good Thing(TM).

More information about the Starlingx-discuss mailing list