[Starlingx-discuss] Requesting WF +1 in stx-config

Church, Robert Robert.Church at windriver.com
Thu Nov 8 18:11:17 UTC 2018


>> You will need a core from stx-integ to approve 614804
Done..

Bob.

From: "Wensley, Barton" <Barton.Wensley at windriver.com>
Date: Thursday, November 8, 2018 at 11:56 AM
To: "Jones, Bruce E" <bruce.e.jones at intel.com>, "starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io" <starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io>
Subject: Re: [Starlingx-discuss] Requesting WF +1 in stx-config

I have approved 614244 and 595865. You will need a core from stx-integ to approve 614804.

Bart

From: Jones, Bruce E [mailto:bruce.e.jones at intel.com]
Sent: November 8, 2018 12:50 PM
To: Jones, Bruce E; starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io
Subject: Re: [Starlingx-discuss] Requesting WF +1 in stx-config

A couple more related to DevStack…

Review https://review.openstack.org/#/c/614804/ in stx-integ needs one more +2 and a WF+1.  Can this be reviewed and merged please too?

Review https://review.openstack.org/#/c/614244/ in stx-update needs one more +2 and a WF +1 too.

      brucej

From: Jones, Bruce E [mailto:bruce.e.jones at intel.com]
Sent: Thursday, November 8, 2018 9:45 AM
To: starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io
Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] Requesting WF +1 in stx-config

Review https://review.openstack.org/#/c/595865/ is waiting for WF+1.  It has +2’s from Bart Wensley and John Kung.  Can this be merged please?

      brucej

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.starlingx.io/pipermail/starlingx-discuss/attachments/20181108/1cc63ff5/attachment.html>


More information about the Starlingx-discuss mailing list