[Starlingx-discuss] Second controller on degraded for long time - Duplex Virtual

[Xie, Cindy]

Jose,
Can you check if you reported issue is similar as the existing one reported here:

https://bugs.launchpad.net/starlingx/+bug/1798836

thx. - cindy

-----Original Message-----
From: Dinescu, Stefan [mailto:Stefan.Dinescu at windriver.com] 
Sent: Thursday, November 8, 2018 11:01 PM
To: Perez Carranza, Jose <jose.perez.carranza at intel.com>; 'starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io' <starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io>
Subject: Re: [Starlingx-discuss] Second controller on degraded for long time - Duplex Virtual

Hello,

Depending on the size of your cinder partition and network speed between the two controller nodes, cinder make take some time to sync as it is usually the biggest partition.

you can use "drbd-overview" to see the progress of the sync.

Thanks,
Stefan
________________________________________
From: Perez Carranza, Jose [jose.perez.carranza at intel.com]
Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2018 4:56 PM
To: 'starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io'
Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] Second controller on degraded for long time -      Duplex Virtual

Hi

I setup a Duplex virtual environment and I noticed that after installation and provisioning of second controller (controller-1) this one stays in Degraded for long time (~ 1 hour), and alarm 400.001 is being displayed [1], Is this normal behavior? Is here a way to take out the controller-1 from 'degraded' to 'available' faster?

1- http://paste.openstack.org/show/734425/


Regards,
José



_______________________________________________
Starlingx-discuss mailing list
Starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io
http://lists.starlingx.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/starlingx-discuss

_______________________________________________
Starlingx-discuss mailing list
Starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io
http://lists.starlingx.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/starlingx-discuss