[Starlingx-discuss] Second controller on degraded for long time - Duplex Virtual

[Sun, Austin]

Hi Cindy:
   Mhg raised bug#1798836 and I worked with him.  I cannot reproduce this issue.  bug#1798836 is using static IPv4 , not dynamic . 
   Mhg's  setup has been changed to do other test. 
@Jose:    could  you raise bug and attach logs ( /var/log/*)  in controller-0/controller-1 ? 

Thanks.
BR
Austin Sun. 
   
   

-----Original Message-----
From: Xie, Cindy 
Sent: Saturday, November 10, 2018 8:12 AM
To: Perez Carranza, Jose <jose.perez.carranza at intel.com>; Sun, Austin <austin.sun at intel.com>; Dinescu, Stefan <Stefan.Dinescu at windriver.com>; 'starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io' <starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io>
Subject: RE: [Starlingx-discuss] Second controller on degraded for long time - Duplex Virtual

So Jose, you think the issue you encountered is the same issue as bug#1798836, my understanding correct?

@Austin who is working on this bug may contact you for more details including log files.

Thx. - cindy

-----Original Message-----
From: Perez Carranza, Jose
Sent: Saturday, November 10, 2018 1:37 AM
To: Xie, Cindy <cindy.xie at intel.com>; Dinescu, Stefan <Stefan.Dinescu at windriver.com>; 'starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io' <starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io>
Subject: RE: [Starlingx-discuss] Second controller on degraded for long time - Duplex Virtual

Hi Cindy 

Actually I did not  fill a Launchpad, I just sent the question to the mailing list, in my case controller-1 gets available after sync (~1 hour) but I did not noticed that after that a controller goes back to degraded mode again. 

Regards,
José


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Xie, Cindy
> Sent: Thursday, November 8, 2018 5:16 PM
> To: Dinescu, Stefan <Stefan.Dinescu at windriver.com>; Perez Carranza, 
> Jose <jose.perez.carranza at intel.com>; 'starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io'
> <starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io>
> Subject: RE: [Starlingx-discuss] Second controller on degraded for 
> long time - Duplex Virtual
> 
> Jose,
> Can you check if you reported issue is similar as the existing one 
> reported
> here:
> 
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/starlingx/+bug/1798836
> 
> thx. - cindy
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dinescu, Stefan [mailto:Stefan.Dinescu at windriver.com]
> Sent: Thursday, November 8, 2018 11:01 PM
> To: Perez Carranza, Jose <jose.perez.carranza at intel.com>; 'starlingx- 
> discuss at lists.starlingx.io' <starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io>
> Subject: Re: [Starlingx-discuss] Second controller on degraded for 
> long time - Duplex Virtual
> 
> Hello,
> 
> Depending on the size of your cinder partition and network speed 
> between the two controller nodes, cinder make take some time to sync 
> as it is usually the biggest partition.
> 
> you can use "drbd-overview" to see the progress of the sync.
> 
> Thanks,
> Stefan
> ________________________________________
> From: Perez Carranza, Jose [jose.perez.carranza at intel.com]
> Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2018 4:56 PM
> To: 'starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io'
> Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] Second controller on degraded for long 
> time - Duplex Virtual
> 
> Hi
> 
> I setup a Duplex virtual environment and I noticed that after 
> installation and provisioning of second controller (controller-1) this 
> one stays in Degraded for long time (~ 1 hour), and alarm 400.001 is 
> being displayed [1], Is this normal behavior? Is here a way to take 
> out the controller-1 from 'degraded' to 'available' faster?
> 
> 1- http://paste.openstack.org/show/734425/
> 
> 
> Regards,
> José
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Starlingx-discuss mailing list
> Starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io
> http://lists.starlingx.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/starlingx-discuss
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Starlingx-discuss mailing list
> Starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io
> http://lists.starlingx.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/starlingx-discuss