[Starlingx-discuss] Second controller on degraded for long time - Duplex Virtual
Hu, Yong
yong.hu at intel.com
Tue Nov 13 04:55:05 UTC 2018
Hi José,
I ever saw this kind of issue when I added a very big disk partition (like 900 GB) on controller node by "host-lvg-modify".
And you might see some info meaningful by "fm alarm-list". In my case the message was about inconsistent in drbd-cinder.
Regards,
Yong
On 12/11/2018, 9:29 PM, "Perez Carranza, Jose" <jose.perez.carranza at intel.com> wrote:
Hi Cindy / Austin
As I mentioned on my previous mail, I did not see the behavior mentioned on the bug, in my case the controller-1 becomes "Available" after the synchronization is finished and did not goes back again to "Degraded" mode. All my tests were done on an virtual environment.
Regards,
José
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Sun, Austin
> Sent: Friday, November 9, 2018 7:10 PM
> To: Xie, Cindy <cindy.xie at intel.com>; Perez Carranza, Jose
> <jose.perez.carranza at intel.com>; Dinescu, Stefan
> <Stefan.Dinescu at windriver.com>; 'starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io'
> <starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io>
> Subject: RE: [Starlingx-discuss] Second controller on degraded for long time -
> Duplex Virtual
>
> Hi Cindy:
> Mhg raised bug#1798836 and I worked with him. I cannot reproduce this
> issue. bug#1798836 is using static IPv4 , not dynamic .
> Mhg's setup has been changed to do other test.
> @Jose: could you raise bug and attach logs ( /var/log/*) in controller-
> 0/controller-1 ?
>
> Thanks.
> BR
> Austin Sun.
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Xie, Cindy
> Sent: Saturday, November 10, 2018 8:12 AM
> To: Perez Carranza, Jose <jose.perez.carranza at intel.com>; Sun, Austin
> <austin.sun at intel.com>; Dinescu, Stefan <Stefan.Dinescu at windriver.com>;
> 'starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io' <starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io>
> Subject: RE: [Starlingx-discuss] Second controller on degraded for long time -
> Duplex Virtual
>
> So Jose, you think the issue you encountered is the same issue as
> bug#1798836, my understanding correct?
>
> @Austin who is working on this bug may contact you for more details
> including log files.
>
> Thx. - cindy
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Perez Carranza, Jose
> Sent: Saturday, November 10, 2018 1:37 AM
> To: Xie, Cindy <cindy.xie at intel.com>; Dinescu, Stefan
> <Stefan.Dinescu at windriver.com>; 'starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io'
> <starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io>
> Subject: RE: [Starlingx-discuss] Second controller on degraded for long time -
> Duplex Virtual
>
> Hi Cindy
>
> Actually I did not fill a Launchpad, I just sent the question to the mailing list,
> in my case controller-1 gets available after sync (~1 hour) but I did not
> noticed that after that a controller goes back to degraded mode again.
>
> Regards,
> José
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Xie, Cindy
> > Sent: Thursday, November 8, 2018 5:16 PM
> > To: Dinescu, Stefan <Stefan.Dinescu at windriver.com>; Perez Carranza,
> > Jose <jose.perez.carranza at intel.com>; 'starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io'
> > <starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io>
> > Subject: RE: [Starlingx-discuss] Second controller on degraded for
> > long time - Duplex Virtual
> >
> > Jose,
> > Can you check if you reported issue is similar as the existing one
> > reported
> > here:
> >
> > https://bugs.launchpad.net/starlingx/+bug/1798836
> >
> > thx. - cindy
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Dinescu, Stefan [mailto:Stefan.Dinescu at windriver.com]
> > Sent: Thursday, November 8, 2018 11:01 PM
> > To: Perez Carranza, Jose <jose.perez.carranza at intel.com>; 'starlingx-
> > discuss at lists.starlingx.io' <starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io>
> > Subject: Re: [Starlingx-discuss] Second controller on degraded for
> > long time - Duplex Virtual
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > Depending on the size of your cinder partition and network speed
> > between the two controller nodes, cinder make take some time to sync
> > as it is usually the biggest partition.
> >
> > you can use "drbd-overview" to see the progress of the sync.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Stefan
> > ________________________________________
> > From: Perez Carranza, Jose [jose.perez.carranza at intel.com]
> > Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2018 4:56 PM
> > To: 'starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io'
> > Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] Second controller on degraded for long
> > time - Duplex Virtual
> >
> > Hi
> >
> > I setup a Duplex virtual environment and I noticed that after
> > installation and provisioning of second controller (controller-1) this
> > one stays in Degraded for long time (~ 1 hour), and alarm 400.001 is
> > being displayed [1], Is this normal behavior? Is here a way to take
> > out the controller-1 from 'degraded' to 'available' faster?
> >
> > 1- http://paste.openstack.org/show/734425/
> >
> >
> > Regards,
> > José
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Starlingx-discuss mailing list
> > Starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io
> > http://lists.starlingx.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/starlingx-discuss
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Starlingx-discuss mailing list
> > Starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io
> > http://lists.starlingx.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/starlingx-discuss
_______________________________________________
Starlingx-discuss mailing list
Starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io
http://lists.starlingx.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/starlingx-discuss
More information about the Starlingx-discuss
mailing list