[Starlingx-discuss] StarlingX alarms fields displayed
michel.thebeau at windriver.com
Tue Oct 16 11:58:09 UTC 2018
I found text of your question in this web document:
Test #85 is presented as the first in a series intended to test alarm
suppression, and that this first test is intended the verify the alarm
presentation without suppression.
I'm not sure that the test instruction is complete or that the
"suppression" field is the right one to look at for this test case.
I've CC'd Tao for her experience on the subject of alarm, events and
On 2018-10-09 12:11 p.m., Perez Carranza, Jose wrote:
> Hi All
> I have a question about the alarms on StarlingX, in one of the scenarios that I'm executing says: - "Verify that entity-instance-field and suppression set to True not shown (system alarm-list, system alarm-show <uuid>)" but actually the "Supression | Ture " is displayed, is this a correct behavior and I should update the scenario, or a Launchpad should be created to address this?
> Starlingx-discuss mailing list
> Starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io
More information about the Starlingx-discuss