[Starlingx-discuss] StarlingX alarms fields displayed

Michel Thebeau michel.thebeau at windriver.com
Tue Oct 16 11:58:09 UTC 2018

Hi Jose,

I found text of your question in this web document:

Test #85 is presented as the first in a series intended to test alarm 
suppression, and that this first test is intended the verify the alarm 
presentation without suppression.

I'm not sure that the test instruction is complete or that the 
"suppression" field is the right one to look at for this test case.  
I've CC'd Tao for her experience on the subject of alarm, events and 
event suppression.


On 2018-10-09 12:11 p.m., Perez Carranza, Jose wrote:
> Hi All
> I have a question about the alarms on StarlingX, in one of the scenarios that I'm executing says:  - "Verify that entity-instance-field and suppression set to True not shown (system alarm-list, system alarm-show  <uuid>)" but actually the "Supression | Ture " is displayed, is this a correct behavior and I should update the scenario, or a Launchpad should be created to address this?
> Regards,
> José
> _______________________________________________
> Starlingx-discuss mailing list
> Starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io
> http://lists.starlingx.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/starlingx-discuss

More information about the Starlingx-discuss mailing list