[Starlingx-discuss] StarlingX alarms fields displayed

[Michel Thebeau]

Thanks Tao,

That's interesting.  I did not know about the system suppressing alarms 
for a locked host.

M


On 2018-10-16 11:27 a.m., Liu, Tao wrote:
> Hi Jose,
>
> I think you should update the scenarios with the some details:
>
> I believe the scenario that you refer is intended to test the system suppresses the alarms that associated with  a host when the host is locked. The alarm entity-instance-id field shows whether the alarm is associated with the host and the suppression field shows whether it allows to be suppressed by the system.  This is different than the suppression_status field shown in the alarm detail. The suppression_status is driven by the user action ( I.e. via CLi command fm event-suppress).
>
> The test procedure would be:
> Prior to lock compute-0, check if there are any alarms that located on compute-0 ( for example entity-instance-id: host=compute-0.filesystem=<mount-dir>)
>
> fm alarm-list --uuid          => display the alarm list with uuid field
>
> fm alarm show <uuid>    => it should the alarm detail ( include suppression field) for a given alarm
>
> After compute-0 is locked, check the alarm list and ensure those alarms are not shown in the list.
>
>
> Regards,
> Tao
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Thebeau, Michel
> Sent: Tuesday, October 16, 2018 7:58 AM
> To: Perez Carranza, Jose; starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io; Liu, Tao
> Subject: Re: [Starlingx-discuss] StarlingX alarms fields displayed
>
> Hi Jose,
>
> I found text of your question in this web document:
> https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/StarlingX/stx.2018.10_Testplan_Instructions
>
> Test #85 is presented as the first in a series intended to test alarm
> suppression, and that this first test is intended the verify the alarm
> presentation without suppression.
>
> I'm not sure that the test instruction is complete or that the
> "suppression" field is the right one to look at for this test case.
> I've CC'd Tao for her experience on the subject of alarm, events and
> event suppression.
>
> M
>
>
> On 2018-10-09 12:11 p.m., Perez Carranza, Jose wrote:
>> Hi All
>>
>> I have a question about the alarms on StarlingX, in one of the scenarios that I'm executing says:  - "Verify that field and suppression set to True not shown (system alarm-list, system alarm-show  <uuid>)" but actually the "Supression | Ture " is displayed, is this a correct behavior and I should update the scenario, or a Launchpad should be created to address this?
>>
>> Regards,
>> José
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Starlingx-discuss mailing list
>> Starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io
>> http://lists.starlingx.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/starlingx-discuss
>