[Starlingx-discuss] bashate failing in stx-integ in some reviews?
Don.Penney at windriver.com
Wed Oct 31 13:51:45 UTC 2018
From: Dean Troyer [mailto:dtroyer at gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2018 9:47 AM
To: Penney, Don
Cc: starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io
Subject: Re: [Starlingx-discuss] bashate failing in stx-integ in some reviews?
On Wed, Oct 31, 2018 at 5:47 AM Penney, Don <Don.Penney at windriver.com> wrote:
> I’m seeing a couple of reviews in stx-integ failing the tox linter job on a bashate error, while most others are successful.
> Happy in this test:
> 2018-10-31 03:06:25.270134 | ubuntu-xenial | Running bashate on /home/zuul/src/git.openstack.org/openstack/stx-integ/base/setup/files/custom.sh
> But failing in this one:
> 2018-10-31 08:21:56.690432 | ubuntu-xenial | Running bashate on /home/zuul/src/git.openstack.org/openstack/stx-integ/base/setup/files/custom.sh
> 2018-10-31 08:21:56.690706 | ubuntu-xenial | /home/zuul/src/git.openstack.org/openstack/stx-integ/base/setup/files/custom.sh:1:1: E004 File did not end with a newline
> So I guess we just fix the script and rebase any failing reviews? It seems very odd that bashate would not always be reporting this error. The tox.ini bashate invocation has not changed recently, either.
Yeah, that is odd. Can you send links tot he reviews those came from?
I think it would be interesting to see what is different between the
job runs, ie cloud provider and such. There _shouldn't_ be anything
that matters different...
dtroyer at gmail.com
More information about the Starlingx-discuss