[Starlingx-discuss] build-pkgs cannot complete std build >> serial builds

Thu Sep 27 15:20:21 UTC 2018

Abandoned.  Erich beat me to it.

Scott

On 18-09-27 11:16 AM, Scott Little wrote:
> Fix posted in ...
>
> https://review.openstack.org/605775
>
>
>
> On 18-09-26 11:10 PM, Sun, Austin wrote:
>> Hi Ghada and Saul:
>>      Thanks.  I'm working for fuzz patch with Shuicheng now,  I will 
>> check build serial issue after "fuzz" task.
>>
>> BR
>> Austin Sun.
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Saul Wold [mailto:sgw at linux.intel.com]
>> Sent: Thursday, September 27, 2018 10:26 AM
>> To: starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io
>> Subject: Re: [Starlingx-discuss] build-pkgs cannot complete std build 
>> >> serial builds
>>
>>
>>
>> On 09/26/2018 06:50 PM, Khalil, Ghada wrote:
>>> Erich,
>>> Given the failures you are seeing, I re-opened
>>> https://bugs.launchpad.net/starlingx/+bug/1790583
>>> (it was still in a Fix Released state even though the original commit
>>> was reverted and a new one is currently in review)
>>>
>>> Austin, I see that you have an update pending for this:
>>> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/603983/
>>> But according to Erich, it didn't address the build issue. Can you 
>>> please investigate further?
>>>
>> OK, I understand Austin's patch now and gave it my +2.
>>
>> I am going to try again with a scratch build now the libvirt bits 
>> have merged (or at least I think they have merged)
>>
>> Sau!
>>> Thanks,
>>> Ghada
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Cordoba Malibran, Erich
>>> [mailto:erich.cordoba.malibran at intel.com]
>>> Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2018 7:43 PM
>>> To: Little, Scott; starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io
>>> Subject: Re: [Starlingx-discuss] build-pkgs cannot complete std build
>>>
>>> Trying to get a serial build avoiding the possible mock problems I 
>>> encounter with this issue:
>>>
>>>
>>> BUILD_AVOIDANCE_URL=
>>> /localdisk/designer/jenkins-slave/starlingx/cgcs-root/build-tools/buil
>>> d-srpms-serial --std
>>> /localdisk/designer/jenkins-slave/starlingx/cgcs-root/build-tools/buil
>>> d-srpms-serial: line 33: /build-srpms-common.sh: No such file or
>>> directory
>>> CLEAN_FLAG=0
>>> 22:26:39 build-srpms-serial --std
>>> 22:26:39 make: all
>>> 22:26:40 ===== Build SRPM for 'remote-clients' =====
>>> 22:26:40
>>> PKG_BASE=/localdisk/designer/jenkins-slave/starlingx/cgcs-root/stx/stx
>>> -clients/remote-clients
>>> 22:26:40
>>> WORK_BASE=/localdisk/loadbuild/jenkins-slave/starlingx/std/inputs/stx/
>>> stx-clients/remote-clients
>>> 22:26:40
>>> RPMBUILD_BASE=/localdisk/loadbuild/jenkins-slave/starlingx/std/inputs/
>>> stx/stx-clients/remote-clients/rpmbuild
>>> 22:26:40
>>> /localdisk/designer/jenkins-slave/starlingx/cgcs-root/build-tools/buil
>>> d-srpms-serial: line 941: md5sums_from_input_vars: command not found
>>> 22:26:40 ERROR: build_dir_spec (943): md5sums_from_input_vars '' 
>>> '/localdisk/designer/jenkins-slave/starlingx/cgcs-root/stx/stx-clients/remote-clients/centos/remote-clients.spec' 
>>> '/localdisk/loadbuild/jenkins-slave/starlingx/std/rpmbuild/SOURCES/remote-clients' 
>>>
>>>
>>> Doing sed -i 's/PARALLEL/SERIAL/g' build-tools/build-srpms-serial
>>> fixes this issue. However, after the srpms are created the
>>> build-rpm-serial script is unable to find these srpms. See below
>>>
>>>
>>> ######## Wed Sep 26 22:36:34 UTC 2018: build-srpm-serial --std was
>>> successful
>>> ######## Wed Sep 26 22:36:34 UTC 2018: Launching build-rpms-serial
>>> --std
>>> /localdisk/designer/jenkins-slave/starlingx/cgcs-root/build-tools/buil
>>> d-rpms-serial --std
>>> FORMAL_BUILD=0
>>> modify-build-cfg
>>> /localdisk/loadbuild/jenkins-slave/starlingx/std/jenkins-slave-starlin
>>> gx-tis-r5-pike-std.cfg Nothing to build in
>>> '/localdisk/loadbuild/jenkins-slave/starlingx/std/rpmbuild/SRPMS'
>>> ######## Wed Sep 26 22:36:35 UTC 2018: build-rpm-serial --std was
>>> successful
>>>
>>> This is reported here:
>>> https://bugs.launchpad.net/starlingx/+bug/1790583
>>> I tried this but it didn't work for me:
>>> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/603983/
>>>
>>> So, for now seems that it's not possible to use serial building.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, 2018-09-26 at 12:16 -0400, Scott Little wrote:
>>>> aclocal 'too many loops' has been popping up sporadically for a week
>>>> or two now.  Possibly 7.5 related.
>>>>
>>>> I suspect that there is a build order and/or race condition element
>>>> to this.   It often goes away if you just run build-pkgs a second
>>>> time.
>>>>
>>>> The second possible element is that build-pkgs is using flags that
>>>> preserve the mock environment between packages.  The goal was to
>>>> avoid reinstalling required packages that are often common across the
>>>> packages we build.   It was a build time speedup that has been in use
>>>> for 2-3 years now without incident.
>>>>
>>>> Google shows that other folks have hit 'aclocal too many loops' as
>>>> well, and there are suggestions that it might be fixed in a recent
>>>> update to automake.  Scanning the changelog for the latest and
>>>> greatest from gnu.org doesn't show any obvious fixes addressing this
>>>> issue.
>>>>
>>>> Scott
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 18-09-26 11:32 AM, Cordoba Malibran, Erich wrote:
>>>>> BUILDSTDERR: aclocal: error: too many loops
>>>>> BUILDSTDERR: aclocal: Please contact <bug-automake at gnu.org>.
>>>>> BUILDSTDERR:  at /usr/share/automake-1.13/Automake/Channels.pm line
>>>>> 662.
>>>>> BUILDSTDERR:     Automake::Channels::msg('automake', '', 'too
>>>>> many loops') called at /usr/share/automake-
>>>>> 1.13/Automake/ChannelDefs.pm line 212
>>>>> BUILDSTDERR:     Automake::ChannelDefs::prog_error('too many
>>>>> loops') called at /usr/bin/aclocal line 1187
>>>>> BUILDSTDERR: error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.Sj0E7c
>>>>> (%build)
>>>>> BUILDSTDERR:     Macro expanded in comment on line 214: %global
>>>>> _libexecdir %{_exec_prefix}/lib
>>>>> BUILDSTDERR:     Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.Sj0E7c
>>>>> (%build)
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Starlingx-discuss mailing list
>>>> Starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io
>>>> http://lists.starlingx.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/starlingx-discuss
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Starlingx-discuss mailing list
>>> Starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io
>>> http://lists.starlingx.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/starlingx-discuss
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Starlingx-discuss mailing list
>>> Starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io
>>> http://lists.starlingx.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/starlingx-discuss
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Starlingx-discuss mailing list
>> Starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io
>> http://lists.starlingx.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/starlingx-discuss
>> _______________________________________________
>> Starlingx-discuss mailing list
>> Starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io
>> http://lists.starlingx.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/starlingx-discuss
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Starlingx-discuss mailing list
> Starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io
> http://lists.starlingx.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/starlingx-discuss