[Starlingx-discuss] May have to consider an lshell replacement

[Young, Ken]

Cindy,

I will copy these questions to the launchpad.

Team,.

Please keep all discussion of this issue within the launchpad.

Regards,
Ken Y

On 2018-09-27, 9:02 PM, "Xie, Cindy" <cindy.xie at intel.com> wrote:

    Is LShell and ibsh specific to CentOS or it applicable for other OS? Say for example, can we look for alternatives that Ubuntu or ClearLinux is using for the similar functionality?
    Thanks. - cindy
    
    -----Original Message-----
    From: Dean Troyer [mailto:dtroyer at gmail.com] 
    Sent: Friday, September 28, 2018 3:07 AM
    To: Jones, Bruce E <bruce.e.jones at intel.com>
    Cc: starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io
    Subject: Re: [Starlingx-discuss] May have to consider an lshell replacement
    
    On Thu, Sep 27, 2018 at 12:45 PM, Jones, Bruce E <bruce.e.jones at intel.com> wrote:
    > What alternatives do we have for this functionality?
    
    Alternatives in increasing levels of commitment to lshell:
    * replace it
    * fork the project and fix the CVEs and continue
    * adopt the project and take over maintenance as a stand0-alone project should the existing maintainer be interested in doing so[0]
    
    I am specifically not listing 'do nothing' as active CVEs must be addressed...
    
    dt
    
    [0] OpenStack has done this on occasion when a dependency goes dormant and the maintainer has no interest in continuing and the cost of converting outweighs the perceived cost of maintenance and ownership.
    
    -- 
    
    Dean Troyer
    dtroyer at gmail.com
    
    _______________________________________________
    Starlingx-discuss mailing list
    Starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io
    http://lists.starlingx.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/starlingx-discuss
    _______________________________________________
    Starlingx-discuss mailing list
    Starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io
    http://lists.starlingx.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/starlingx-discuss