[Starlingx-discuss] [Bug] flavor "pci_passthrough:alias" should be required to passthrough physical NICs

[Xu, Chenjie]

Hi Matt,
Yes, I mean the port that does not report itself as a PF.

Best Regards,
Xu, Chenjie

From: Peters, Matt [mailto:Matt.Peters at windriver.com]
Sent: Wednesday, August 7, 2019 12:55 AM
To: Xu, Chenjie <chenjie.xu at intel.com>; Webster, Steven <Steven.Webster at windriver.com>; Kopec, Gerald (Gerry) <Gerry.Kopec at windriver.com>
Cc: Khalil, Ghada <Ghada.Khalil at windriver.com>; Zhao, Forrest <forrest.zhao at intel.com>; starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io
Subject: Re: [Starlingx-discuss] [Bug] flavor "pci_passthrough:alias" should be required to passthrough physical NICs

Hello Chenjie,
We typically configure the PCI-PT devices using the vnic-type option for manually created ports.  This replaces the older mechanism of being able to specify the vif-type (which was a StarlingX specific extension that was dropped).

For your question about the NIC type that does not support SR-IOV, do you mean a port that does not report itself as a PF (from a libvirt/nova perspective that would be device with Type-PCI vs Type-PF)?

-Matt

From: "Xu, Chenjie" <chenjie.xu at intel.com<mailto:chenjie.xu at intel.com>>
Date: Tuesday, August 6, 2019 at 11:14 AM
To: "Peters, Matt" <Matt.Peters at windriver.com<mailto:Matt.Peters at windriver.com>>, "Webster, Steven" <Steven.Webster at windriver.com<mailto:Steven.Webster at windriver.com>>, "Kopec, Gerald (Gerry)" <Gerry.Kopec at windriver.com<mailto:Gerry.Kopec at windriver.com>>
Cc: Ghada Khalil <Ghada.Khalil at windriver.com<mailto:Ghada.Khalil at windriver.com>>, "Zhao, Forrest" <forrest.zhao at intel.com<mailto:forrest.zhao at intel.com>>, "starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io<mailto:starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io>" <starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io<mailto:starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io>>
Subject: RE: [Starlingx-discuss] [Bug] flavor "pci_passthrough:alias" should be required to passthrough physical NICs

Hi Matt,

I find another way to pass through SR-IOV capable physical NIC to VM. This new way doesn't require to configure "PCI alias". The key point is to create a port whose vnic_type is direct-physical. The following link can be referenced:
https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-us/red_hat_openstack_platform/10/html/networking_guide/sr-iov-support-for-virtual-networking

However if we try to pass through a physical NIC which doesn't support SR-IOV, we may still need to configure "PCI alias". Because I don't have a physical NIC which doesn't support SR-IOV on my server, I can't test passing such NIC to VM by creating port whose vnic_type is direct-physical.

Do you think StarlingX needs to configure “PCI alias” automatically for physical NIC which doesn’t support SR-IOV or not?

Best Regards,
Xu, Chenjie

From: Peters, Matt [mailto:Matt.Peters at windriver.com]
Sent: Thursday, August 1, 2019 6:34 PM
To: Xu, Chenjie <chenjie.xu at intel.com<mailto:chenjie.xu at intel.com>>; Webster, Steven <Steven.Webster at windriver.com<mailto:Steven.Webster at windriver.com>>; Kopec, Gerald (Gerry) <Gerry.Kopec at windriver.com<mailto:Gerry.Kopec at windriver.com>>
Cc: Khalil, Ghada <Ghada.Khalil at windriver.com<mailto:Ghada.Khalil at windriver.com>>; Zhao, Forrest <forrest.zhao at intel.com<mailto:forrest.zhao at intel.com>>; starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io<mailto:starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io>
Subject: Re: [Starlingx-discuss] [Bug] flavor "pci_passthrough:alias" should be required to passthrough physical NICs

+Steve +Gerry

Do you have any additional information to add here?  I don’t believe we had to setup an alias in the past to do PCI-PT, so is this something that is new to the latest OpenStack nova release?  Did we drop some functionality to align with upstream nova (that use to be in starlingx-staging)?

-Matt

From: "Xu, Chenjie" <chenjie.xu at intel.com<mailto:chenjie.xu at intel.com>>
Date: Thursday, August 1, 2019 at 3:36 AM
To: "Peters, Matt" <Matt.Peters at windriver.com<mailto:Matt.Peters at windriver.com>>
Cc: Ghada Khalil <Ghada.Khalil at windriver.com<mailto:Ghada.Khalil at windriver.com>>, "Zhao, Forrest" <forrest.zhao at intel.com<mailto:forrest.zhao at intel.com>>, "starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io<mailto:starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io>" <starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io<mailto:starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io>>
Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] [Bug] flavor "pci_passthrough:alias" should be required to passthrough physical NICs


Hi Matt,

Based on my testing, the flavor with property “pci_passthrough:alias” should be required for passing a physical NIC to the VM. But it should not be required for passing a VF to the VM. So I think the alias information should contain physical NICs which are configured with “pci-passthrough” by following command:
system host-if-modify -m 1500 -n pcipass -c pci-passthrough ${COMPUTE} ${IFUUID}
   system interface-datanetwork-assign ${COMPUTE} pcipass ${PHYSNET2}

Could you please let me know your opinions and leave a comment in the below bug:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/starlingx/+bug/1836682

Best Regards,
Xu, Chenjie
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.starlingx.io/pipermail/starlingx-discuss/attachments/20190807/e63edd92/attachment.html>