[Starlingx-discuss] Duplex Configuration: Unlock of controller-0 causes reboot
Marcel Schaible
marcel at schaible-consulting.de
Wed Feb 13 17:17:39 UTC 2019
At the moment the system seems to stablize after 2 reboots. I'll keep an eye on that.
Is the alarm list looking reasonable after the controller-0 is unlocked and rebooted?
If yes, I would start to configure the controller-1.
root at controller-0 ~(keystone_admin)]# fm alarm-list
+----------+-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+---------------------------------------------------------------------+----------+----------------------------+
| Alarm ID | Reason Text | Entity ID | Severity | Time Stamp |
+----------+-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+---------------------------------------------------------------------+----------+----------------------------+
| 200.011 | controller-0 experienced a configuration failure. | host=controller-0 | critical | 2019-02-13T18:57:13.772108 |
| 400.002 | Service group controller-services loss of redundancy; expected 1 standby member but no standby members available | service_domain=controller.service_group=controller-services | major | 2019-02-13T18:56:15.215083 |
| 400.002 | Service group vim-services loss of redundancy; expected 1 standby member but no standby members available | service_domain=controller.service_group=vim-services | major | 2019-02-13T18:56:15.174083 |
| 400.002 | Service group cloud-services loss of redundancy; expected 1 standby member but no standby members available | service_domain=controller.service_group=cloud-services | major | 2019-02-13T18:56:12.213065 |
| 400.002 | Service group oam-services loss of redundancy; expected 1 standby member but no standby members available | service_domain=controller.service_group=oam-services | major | 2019-02-13T18:56:05.330099 |
| 400.002 | Service group patching-services loss of redundancy; expected 1 standby member but no standby members available | service_domain=controller.service_group=patching-services | major | 2019-02-13T18:56:04.276424 |
| 400.002 | Service group directory-services loss of redundancy; expected 2 active members but only 1 active member available | service_domain=controller.service_group=directory-services | major | 2019-02-13T18:56:04.195081 |
| 400.002 | Service group web-services loss of redundancy; expected 2 active members but only 1 active member available | service_domain=controller.service_group=web-services | major | 2019-02-13T18:56:04.114064 |
| 400.005 | Communication failure detected with peer over port enp9s20f7 on host controller-0 | host=controller-0.network=mgmt | major | 2019-02-13T18:56:03.790070 |
| 100.106 | 'OAM' Port failed. | host=controller-0.port=cd202069-f5a0-43bb-a445-d3b9b58ce631 | major | 2019-02-13T18:56:00.563067 |
| 100.107 | 'OAM' Interface degraded. | host=controller-0.interface=oam | major | 2019-02-13T18:56:00.515836 |
| 300.004 | No enabled compute host with connectivity to provider network. | service=networking.providernet=e9eef26b-d266-4b3f-b1b7-6d9c2cd3a86b | major | 2019-02-13T17:20:21.110405 |
+----------+-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+---------------------------------------------------------------------+----------+----------------------------+
[root at controller-0 ~(keystone_admin)]#
> "Penney, Don" <Don.Penney at windriver.com> hat am 13. Februar 2019 um 18:02 geschrieben:
>
>
> Ok, my updates related to the DRBD state change failures merged Feb 8th.
>
> I wouldn't expect to see an additional reboot. So what you're seeing, just to confirm, is:
> * install node, run config_controller, do config steps
> * system host-unlock controller-0
> * system reboots
> * system reboots a second time?
Yes, exactly.
>
> At what point is it rebooting a second time? Maybe a reboot is being triggered due to config changes made when the puppet manifests apply, which I think we could confirm from the puppet logs.
The second reboot starts in about 1 minute after the login prompt is shown.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Marcel Schaible [mailto:marcel at schaible-consulting.de]
> Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2019 11:48 AM
> To: Penney, Don; starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io
> Subject: Re: [Starlingx-discuss] Duplex Configuration: Unlock of controller-0 causes reboot
>
> I am using the build centos-20190206T060000Z.
>
> The main problem, beside of the noise is, that the system comes up and reboots immediately again.
>
>
>
> > "Penney, Don" <Don.Penney at windriver.com> hat am 13. Februar 2019 um 17:41 geschrieben:
> >
> >
> > Yes, this is the correct behavior.
> >
> > As for the drbd warnings, there are some state change failures that occur as the system shuts down, but aren't a problem (aside from the noise). I've managed to clean up most of these in a recent update. What build are you using?
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Marcel Schaible [mailto:marcel at schaible-consulting.de]
> > Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2019 11:28 AM
> > To: starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io
> > Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] Duplex Configuration: Unlock of controller-0 causes reboot
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > when I unlock the controller-0 after installation following this tutorial
> >
> > https://docs.starlingx.io/installation_guide/duplex.html#duplex
> >
> > the system is rebooting automatically with a lot of errors from drdb.
> >
> > Controller-1 is not configured at this point in time.
> >
> > Must I configure the secondary controller before unlocking controller-0?
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > Marcel
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Starlingx-discuss mailing list
> > Starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io
> > http://lists.starlingx.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/starlingx-discuss
>
> _______________________________________________
> Starlingx-discuss mailing list
> Starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io
> http://lists.starlingx.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/starlingx-discuss
More information about the Starlingx-discuss
mailing list