[Starlingx-discuss] CentOS7.6 testing status - blocked
Liu, Yang
yang.liu at windriver.com
Wed Feb 13 19:01:35 UTC 2019
Hi Cindy,
We are still seeing the same file permission issue for grubx64.efi under pxeboot/EFI, causing UEFI pxeboot to fail.
We need the grubx64.efi to be readable by others as well.
../pxeboot/EFI/
total 1220
drwxrwsr-x 3 jenkins mock 4096 Feb 12 16:48 .
drwxrwsr-x 3 jenkins mock 4096 Feb 12 16:48 ..
drwxrwsr-x 3 jenkins mock 4096 Feb 12 16:48 centos
-rwx------ 1 jenkins mock 1233016 Feb 12 16:37 grubx64.efi
The patch seems to have changed the dir permission for centos from 700 to 755, but not grubx64.efi.
For the dir permission for centos, I believe the original 700 should be sufficient (@Scott, please correct me if it's wrong).
BR,
Yang
From: Liu, Yang
Sent: February-12-19 9:00 AM
To: 'Xie, Cindy'; starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io; Cabrales, Ada; Waheed, Numan
Subject: RE: CentOS7.6 testing status - blocked
Thanks Cindy. Will do.
BR,
Yang
From: Xie, Cindy [mailto:cindy.xie at intel.com]
Sent: February-11-19 8:10 PM
To: Liu, Yang; starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io; Cabrales, Ada; Waheed, Numan
Subject: RE: CentOS7.6 testing status - blocked
Hi, Numan/Yang,
The last pending patch (https://review.openstack.org/#/c/634559/) which was blocking your testing (#1814360) was just merged. Please get new build ISO from Jason so you can continue the testing.
Thx. - cindy
From: Liu, Yang [mailto:yang.liu at windriver.com]
Sent: Saturday, February 9, 2019 10:18 AM
To: Xie, Cindy <cindy.xie at intel.com>; starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io
Subject: RE: CentOS7.6 testing status - blocked
Correct.
BR,
Yang
From: Xie, Cindy [mailto:cindy.xie at intel.com]
Sent: February-08-19 8:28 PM
To: Liu, Yang; starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io<mailto:starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io>
Subject: RE: CentOS7.6 testing status - blocked
Hi, Yang,
Thanks for the report.
Are the "two node system" below referring to Duplex? Just want to confirm because #1814360 we have a patch pending and we do want to ensure it works on Duplex as well.
Th.x - cindy
From: Liu, Yang [mailto:yang.liu at windriver.com]
Sent: Saturday, February 9, 2019 2:09 AM
To: starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io<mailto:starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io>
Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] CentOS7.6 testing status - blocked
Hi folks,
Here's an update for CentOS7.6 testing.
We are currently blocked due to pxeboot from controller-0 does not work for EFI. (#1814360)
We will continue after that issue is resolved.
System
NICs
Mgmt;infra;data
Special Configs
Test coverage after Install and Config
Status/Issues
Dedicated storage
X540-AT2; X540-AT2; fortville
IPv6
Sanity, nova
Completed. New issues logged.
#1814336 CentOS7.6: Unable to launch vm directly from virsh<https://bugs.launchpad.net/starlingx/+bug/1814336>
#1814335 CentOS7.6: Unable to launch vm with UEFI boot<https://bugs.launchpad.net/starlingx/+bug/1814335>
One node system
none; none; X522/X577-AT
Sanity, basic regression
Completed. Passed.
Two node system
fortville; fortville; fortville
tboot, tpm, https,
extended security profile
Sanity, security
Blocked by #1814360
Multi-node system
BCM5720; Niantic; Niantic
Sriov(niantic),pcipt(niantic)
Sanity, networking
Completed. Passed.
Two node system
Fortville; none; Fortville
Low latency, UEFI
Sanity, basic regression, cyclictest
Blocked by #1814360
Two node system
Fortville; none; Fortville
Secure boot
Sanity, security
Blocked by #1814360
Multi-node system
I350; Niantic/cx3; cx3
Pxeboot script
Sanity
Completed. Passed.
Only compute-0 was used, since compute-1 has CX3 data nic.
??
CX4 on infra or mgmt, but NOT data
Won't test. We don't have a system have required nics.
BR,
yang
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.starlingx.io/pipermail/starlingx-discuss/attachments/20190213/763c535c/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the Starlingx-discuss
mailing list