[Starlingx-discuss] STX install_state status

[Alonso, Juan Carlos]

I think I will open a Launchpad to track the progress on it :)

Regards.
Juan Carlos Alonso

From: Penney, Don [mailto:Don.Penney at windriver.com]
Sent: Friday, January 4, 2019 1:51 PM
To: Alonso, Juan Carlos <juan.carlos.alonso at intel.com>; Little, Scott <Scott.Little at windriver.com>; starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io
Subject: RE: [Starlingx-discuss] STX install_state status

Looking at:
http://mirror.starlingx.cengn.ca/mirror/starlingx/master/centos/latest_build/outputs/installer/

There are still files with -stx-0.2 suffix, and some with new- prefix. The pxe-network-installer RPM is looking for the files with neither:
https://github.com/openstack/stx-metal/blob/master/installer/pxe-network-installer/centos/build_srpm.data

So it's likely still picking up the stock images, rather than the patched ones.


From: Alonso, Juan Carlos [mailto:juan.carlos.alonso at intel.com]
Sent: Friday, January 04, 2019 2:46 PM
To: Little, Scott; starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io<mailto:starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io>
Subject: Re: [Starlingx-discuss] STX install_state status

Hi,

Seems that the issue is still present on the last CENGN ISO: http://mirror.starlingx.cengn.ca/mirror/starlingx/master/centos/latest_build/outputs/iso/
Can you help me to verify if patches were integrated on the ISO?

Regards.
Juan Carlos Alonso

From: Scott Little [mailto:scott.little at windriver.com]
Sent: Thursday, January 3, 2019 3:31 PM
To: starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io<mailto:starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io>
Subject: Re: [Starlingx-discuss] STX install_state status

I've updated the build scripts at CENGN.  We were still using the -0.2 qualified names at one point in the scripts.

The next build should rebuild pxe-network-installer with the the correct kernel and ram disk.

Scott


On 2019-01-03 3:59 p.m., Penney, Don wrote:
I've downloaded the CENGN ISO from:
http://mirror.starlingx.cengn.ca/mirror/starlingx/master/centos/latest_build/outputs/iso/

and it does not contain the installer patches. However, the installer image here is patched:
http://mirror.starlingx.cengn.ca/mirror/starlingx/master/centos/latest_build/outputs/installer/

We'll have to look at the build to see what's going on here.


From: Alonso, Juan Carlos [mailto:juan.carlos.alonso at intel.com]
Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2019 3:18 PM
To: Penney, Don; starlingx
Subject: RE: STX install_state status

Thank You for your help,

I am using the latest ISO from CENGN and has the same issue.
Do you know if there is a Launchpad already open for this issue?

Regards.
Juan Carlos Alonso

From: Penney, Don [mailto:Don.Penney at windriver.com]
Sent: Thursday, January 3, 2019 2:06 PM
To: Alonso, Juan Carlos <juan.carlos.alonso at intel.com><mailto:juan.carlos.alonso at intel.com>; starlingx <starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io><mailto:starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io>
Subject: RE: STX install_state status

Please see my reply (attached) to the thread "the install progress information has missing when install computer node , storage node, and new controller node". In particular, please check that your installer has the required patch. If you're using a stock CentOS installer image, you will not get the install-state notifications.

Cheers,
Don.

From: Alonso, Juan Carlos [mailto:juan.carlos.alonso at intel.com]
Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2019 3:00 PM
To: starlingx
Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] STX install_state status

Hi,

Do someone have faced an issue with install states status when a new host is added?
During controller, compute or storage host installation:

system host-show controller-1 | grep install
| install_output      | text
| install_state       | None
| install_state_info  | None

During installation several values should be showed as pre-install, installing, completed. At the end of installation the output must be install_state = completed.

Regards.
Juan Carlos Alonso



_______________________________________________

Starlingx-discuss mailing list

Starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io<mailto:Starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io>

http://lists.starlingx.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/starlingx-discuss


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.starlingx.io/pipermail/starlingx-discuss/attachments/20190104/714cc223/attachment.html>