[Starlingx-discuss] EdgeX deeper integration?

[Hu, Yong]

Alex,
About "official EdgeX application", did you mean an Armada application with helm charts in the context of StarlingX?
If so, I think it's worth making it as an "optional" application and sysadmin can install/apply it when needed.

On 09/07/2019, 5:04 AM, "Kozyrev, Alexander (Alex)" <Alex.Kozyrev at windriver.com> wrote:

    StarlingX Akraino blueprint is focused on validation of EdgeX Foundry services
    running on StralingX far edge cluster by providing an integration CI/CD pipeline.
    
    And we definitely need some improvements in our current implementation.
    As you can see from our test_kube_edgex_services.py test script I used
    not really mature open-source project for EdgeX on Kubernetes [0] 
    Creation of official EdgeX application would benefit to all involved projects.
    
    [0] https://github.com/rohitsardesai83/edgex-on-kubernetes
    
    -----Original Message-----
    From: Zvonar, Bill [mailto:Bill.Zvonar at windriver.com] 
    Sent: Friday, 28 June, 2019 09:02
    To: Cordoba Malibran, Erich; Jones, Bruce E; starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io
    Subject: Re: [Starlingx-discuss] EdgeX deeper integration?
    
    There's definitely interest from the Akraino/StarlingX perspective.
    
    For those that aren't aware, the EdgeX Foundry application is part of Akraino's StarlingX blueprint [0].
    
    As plans unfold for the next release of Akraino, we will be happy to have contributions in this area. 
    
    [0] https://wiki.akraino.org/display/AK/StarlingX+Far+Edge+Distributed+Cloud
    
    -----Original Message-----
    From: Cordoba Malibran, Erich <erich.cordoba.malibran at intel.com> 
    Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2019 5:01 PM
    To: Jones, Bruce E <bruce.e.jones at intel.com>; starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io
    Subject: Re: [Starlingx-discuss] EdgeX deeper integration?
    
    Actually, in the ongoing review for the pytest framework there is this setup of EdgeX in k8s. 
    
    https://review.opendev.org/#/c/665419/3/automated-pytest-suite/testcases/functional/z_containers/test_kube_edgex_services.py
    
    This could be a good start point to create an EdgeX application. 
    
    -Erich
    
    On Thu, 2019-06-27 at 19:54 +0000, Jones, Bruce E wrote:
    > We had an internal discussion today about EdgeX.  We are seeing signs 
    > of it increasing in use and importance in the Edge ecosystem.
    >  
    > It is fairly straightforward to build and run an EdgeX application 
    > under StarlingX today.  We had it running in the Intel booth at the 
    > Denver Summit.
    >  
    > My question for the community is this:  Is there value or interest in 
    > making EdgeX apps even easier to run within StarlingX?  For example, 
    > we could create an EdgeX application in StarlingX and allow users to 
    > apply it to the system, to allow  the EdgeX services to run and be 
    > managed by StarlingX.  This would add some ease of use benefits for 
    > EdgeX users while also putting us in the position of maintaining an up 
    > to date version of EdgeX.
    >  
    > Is this something we should work on as a community?
    >  
    >           brucej
    >  
    >  
    >  
    > _______________________________________________
    > Starlingx-discuss mailing list
    > Starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io
    > http://lists.starlingx.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/starlingx-discuss
    _______________________________________________
    Starlingx-discuss mailing list
    Starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io
    http://lists.starlingx.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/starlingx-discuss
    _______________________________________________
    Starlingx-discuss mailing list
    Starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io
    http://lists.starlingx.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/starlingx-discuss
    _______________________________________________
    Starlingx-discuss mailing list
    Starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io
    http://lists.starlingx.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/starlingx-discuss