[Starlingx-discuss] About sanity test block issue - Create instance from Image or from Volume fails

[Liu, ZhipengS]

Sorry for pasting a wrong LP link in my last mail, correct it!

From: Liu, ZhipengS [mailto:zhipengs.liu at intel.com]
Sent: 2019年7月23日 10:32
To: Perez Ibarra, Maria G <maria.g.perez.ibarra at intel.com>; starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io
Cc: zhu.boxiang at 99cloud.net
Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] About sanity test block issue - Create instance from Image or from Volume fails

Hi Boxiang and all,

https://bugs.launchpad.net/starlingx/+bug/1837241
This issue should be a regression issue. Pls see above LP link for more info.

In test log, it shows below error.
fault message: u'Build of instance ab3dfe11-3ac3-4a26-a1ce-3bff1e2ca78b aborted: Image 69e1593f-4d03-4cd5-9779-8ffc1d227da0 is unacceptable: Converted to raw, but format is now qcow2'

In 20190719T013000Z/outputs/CHANGELOG.txt
I saw we merged
https://review.opendev.org/#/c/661512/
==================================================================
Use true for force_raw_images when using ceph image backend
We need this patch for two reasons:
Nova of starlingx has not this patch[0]. We use remote storage(ceph)
as nova backend. If we set force_raw_image to False and use qcow2
format image to boot vms, the vms will fail to boot.

Nova of starlingx will have this patch[0]. If we still use False for
force_raw_images, the nova-compute service will refuse to start.

So that, we must set this force_raw_images to True at all.

[0] https://review.opendev.org/#/c/640271/
==================================================================
However, I double checked our current stein.2 nova, [0] is not included. This is the problem!

I have 2 proposals below:
   1) Revert 640271 to unblock sanity test first
   2) Cherry pick [0] to nova stein.2

Any comment?

Thanks!
Zhipeng
From: Perez Ibarra, Maria G [mailto:maria.g.perez.ibarra at intel.com]
Sent: 2019年7月23日 7:49
To: starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io<mailto:starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io>
Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] [Containers] Sanity Test - ISO 20190722

Status of the Sanity Test for last CENGN ISO: bootimage.iso from 2019-Jul-22 (link<http://mirror.starlingx.cengn.ca/mirror/starlingx/master/centos/20190721T233000Z/outputs/iso/>)



Status: RED



===========================================



Sanity Test is executed in a Containers - Bare Metal Environment


AIO - Simplex



Setup             04 TCs [PASS]

Provisioning      01 TCs [PASS]

Sanity OpenStack  49 TCs [PASS]

Sanity Platform   07 TCs [PASS]



TOTAL: [ 61 TCs PASS ]


AIO - Duplex



Setup             04 TCs [PASS]

Provisioning      01 TCs [PASS]

Sanity OpenStack  52 TCs [PASS]

Sanity Platform   07 TCs [PASS]



TOTAL: [ 64 TCs PASS ]



Standard - Dedicated Storage (2+2+2)



Setup             04 TCs [PASS]

Provisioning      01 TCs [PASS]

Sanity OpenStack  52 TCs [PASS] 24 TCs FAIL

Sanity Platform   09 TCs [PASS]



TOTAL: [ 66 TCs PASS ]


===========================================



Sanity Test is executed in a Containers - Virtual Environment


AIO - Simplex



Setup             04 TCs [PASS]

Provisioning      01 TCs [PASS]

Sanity OpenStack  49 TCs [PASS]

Sanity Platform   07 TCs [PASS]



TOTAL: [ 61 TCs PASS ]



AIO - Duplex



Setup             04 TCs [PASS]

Provisioning      01 TCs [PASS]

Sanity OpenStack  52 TCs [PASS] 24 TCs FAIL

Sanity Platform   07 TCs [PASS]



TOTAL: [ 64 TCs PASS ]



Standard - Local Storage (2+2)



Setup             04 TCs [PASS]

Provisioning      01 TCs [PASS]

Sanity OpenStack  52 TCs [PASS]

Sanity Platform   08 TCs [PASS]



TOTAL: [ 65 TCs PASS ]



Standard - External Storage (2+2+2)



Setup             04 TCs [PASS]

Provisioning      01 TCs [PASS]

Sanity OpenStack  52 TCs [PASS] 24 TCs FAIL

Sanity Platform   08 TCs [PASS]



TOTAL: [ 65 TCs PASS ]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Create instance from Image or from Volume fails https://bugs.launchpad.net/starlingx/+bug/1837241

Regards
Maria G.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.starlingx.io/pipermail/starlingx-discuss/attachments/20190723/90b23aed/attachment-0001.html>