[Starlingx-discuss] Bootstrap playbook relocation

[Scott Little]

Well, so as long as the Tee, and the authors of these reviews (if 
different), and any other interested parties are all aware of the 
forthcoming history rewrite, I won't object.  The interested community 
should be small for such a new repo.

Scott


On 2019-06-14 9:05 p.m., Penney, Don wrote:
> I see the following:
> 2dc3228 Add .gitignore to ansible-stx-playbooks repo
> d3360f6 Populate stx-ansible-playbooks repo
> 6bef82a Initial zuul / TOX setup
> 4266117 Added .gitreview
>
> The second one on the list, d3360f6, was just moving the playbookconfig dir from stx-config, and population the centos_iso_image.inc and centos_pkg_dirs files for the build. I believe the first and second ones were also just copies of the files in stx-config, setting up the repo.
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dean Troyer [mailto:dtroyer at gmail.com]
> Sent: Friday, June 14, 2019 8:16 PM
> To: Jeremy Stanley
> Cc: starlingx
> Subject: Re: [Starlingx-discuss] Bootstrap playbook relocation
>
> On Fri, Jun 14, 2019 at 6:44 PM Jeremy Stanley <fungi at yuggoth.org> wrote:
>> Once you have an external, publicly cloneable repo somewhere from
>> which I can pull the new refs, I'm happy push --force those over top
>> of the old content. Or if you prefer, you can propose a temporary
>> ACL change for that repo in openstack/project-config to grant some
>> Gerrit group you're in access to do the same, and I'll be glad to
>> review/approve it.
> Thanks Jeremy, I imagine we'll create it in starlingx-staging and push
> from there.  It sounds like we'll see what Scott wants to do on
> Monday.
>
> There are 4 merged reviews in that project now, I know we'll have to
> re-create them.  After a force-push will they still have anything
> interesting?  I don't think it will be a big deal, just curious.
>
> dt
>