[Starlingx-discuss] [Containers] Sanity Test - ISO 20190619

[Khalil, Ghada]

Thanks Maria.
I expect you will have issues as per the bug below which will impact nova/VM functionality, so you may need to wait for tonight's build for a virtual env sanity.

Regards,
Ghada

From: Perez Ibarra, Maria G [mailto:maria.g.perez.ibarra at intel.com]
Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2019 7:18 PM
To: Khalil, Ghada; Jones, Bruce E; Zvonar, Bill
Cc: starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io
Subject: RE: [Starlingx-discuss] [Containers] Sanity Test - ISO 20190619

Hello Ghada,

The execution in virtual environment takes more time than baremetal. Yesterday's execution started late and the virtual environment wasn't attempted. For today's build we are working on gathering results and in a final debug, we are seeing possible issues launching VM that only applies in a virtual environment and creating the appropriate Launchpad.

Regards
Maria G.


From: Khalil, Ghada [mailto:Ghada.Khalil at windriver.com]
Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2019 6:02 PM
To: Jones, Bruce E <bruce.e.jones at intel.com<mailto:bruce.e.jones at intel.com>>; Zvonar, Bill <Bill.Zvonar at windriver.com<mailto:Bill.Zvonar at windriver.com>>; Perez Ibarra, Maria G <maria.g.perez.ibarra at intel.com<mailto:maria.g.perez.ibarra at intel.com>>
Cc: starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io<mailto:starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io>
Subject: RE: [Starlingx-discuss] [Containers] Sanity Test - ISO 20190619

Hi Bruce,
My understanding is that sanity would be red with this load if run on a virtual env (or if run with vswitch_type = none) due to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/starlingx/+bug/1833497

I don't see results from a virtual env sanity below.

Maria,
Can you comment on whether the virtual env sanity was attempted or not?

Thanks,
Ghada


From: Jones, Bruce E [mailto:bruce.e.jones at intel.com]
Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2019 1:00 PM
To: Khalil, Ghada; Zvonar, Bill
Cc: starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io<mailto:starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io>
Subject: RE: [Starlingx-discuss] [Containers] Sanity Test - ISO 20190619

Ghada, Bill - taking this to email since there is no release meeting today.  This isn't the Green Sanity we were hoping for, but is it green enough to declare the milestone?

I would support declaring MS-3 based on these results.

            brucej

From: Perez Ibarra, Maria G [mailto:maria.g.perez.ibarra at intel.com]
Sent: Wednesday, June 19, 2019 8:33 PM
To: starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io<mailto:starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io>
Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] [Containers] Sanity Test - ISO 20190619

Status of the Sanity Test for last CENGN ISO: bootimage.iso from 2019-Jun-19 (link<http://mirror.starlingx.cengn.ca/mirror/starlingx/master/centos/20190619T140326Z/outputs/iso/>)



Status: YELLOW


======================
Bare Metal environment
======================
    AIO - Simplex:

    Setup                                 03 TCs
    Provision-Containers     01 TCs
    Sanity-OpenStack           49 TCs
    Sanity-Platform              11 TCs
    ------------------------------
    TOTAL:                  64 TCs

    AIO - Duplex:

    Setup                                03 TCs
    Provision-Containers    01 TCs
    Sanity-OpenStack          52 TCs | 13 TCs FAIL
    Sanity-Platform             09 TCs
    ------------------------------
    TOTAL:                  65 TCs

    Standard - Local Storage (2+2):

    Setup                                03 TCs
    Provision-Containers    01 TCs
    Sanity-OpenStack          52 TCs
    Sanity-Platform             09 TCs
    ------------------------------
    TOTAL:                  65 TCs

    Standard - External Storage (2+2+2):
    Setup                                03 TCs
    Provision-Containers    01 TCs
    Sanity-OpenStack          52 TCs
    Sanity-Platform             05 TCs
    ------------------------------
    TOTAL:                  61 TCs

The issue was that in duplex configuration Volumes could not been created. We'll investigate more on these problems in the next execution.

Regards
Maria G.



-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.starlingx.io/pipermail/starlingx-discuss/attachments/20190620/1ff91b32/attachment-0001.html>