[Starlingx-discuss] Feedback needed on updated overview diagram

[Wensley, Barton]

+1

-----Original Message-----
From: Jones, Bruce E [mailto:bruce.e.jones at intel.com] 
Sent: February 28, 2019 5:55 PM
To: Ildiko Vancsa; Gowan, Jeff; Wensley, Barton
Cc: starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io
Subject: RE: [Starlingx-discuss] Feedback needed on updated overview diagram

LGTM, nicely done.

-----Original Message-----
From: Ildiko Vancsa [mailto:ildiko.vancsa at gmail.com] 
Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2019 1:32 PM
To: Gowan, Jeff <Jeff.Gowan at windriver.com>; Wensley, Barton <Barton.Wensley at windriver.com>
Cc: starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io
Subject: Re: [Starlingx-discuss] Feedback needed on updated overview diagram

Hi,

Thank you for the feedback.

Here is an updated diagram incorporating your comments: https://www.dropbox.com/s/0qczsc6pl55j9i4/StarlingX_Diagram_SimplifiedArchitecture.jpg?dl=0

Please let me know your thoughts.

Thanks,
Ildikó


> On 2019. Feb 22., at 21:42, Gowan, Jeff <Jeff.Gowan at windriver.com> wrote:
> 
> I agree with Bart.
> -Jeff
> 
> On 2/22/19, 5:14 AM, "Wensley, Barton" <Barton.Wensley at windriver.com> wrote:
> 
>    Ildikó,
> 
>    I like version -01 - with the kubernetes component names. Each component is already in the "Kubernetes Components" box so you aren't losing any detail by dropping the "kube-" prefix.
> 
>    For the OpenStack components, I'd lean towards using the functional names (Compute, Identity, Block Storage) instead of the code names. Anyone familiar with OpenStack will understand either, but for those less OpenStack knowledge, the functional names will be easier to understand.
> 
>    Bart
> 
>    -----Original Message-----
>    From: Ildiko Vancsa [mailto:ildiko.vancsa at gmail.com] 
>    Sent: February 22, 2019 4:09 AM
>    To: starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io
>    Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] Feedback needed on updated overview diagram
> 
>    Hi StarlingX Community,
> 
>    We are working on an updated overview diagram for StarlingX to highlight the work on containerization: https://www.dropbox.com/sh/7fz6ae9moi89e5l/AABBG5PzzJAv7BKKJ1aEdBDja?dl=0
> 
>    We have two versions adding Kubernetes components to the diagram in a dedicated section and update the open source components on the bottom. The difference between the two versions is the way to refer to the Kubernetes items, -01 is using component names and -02 is using the CLI reference where applicable.
> 
>    I would prefer version -01 for simplicity as well as making it clear that this is an overview diagram as opposed to a detailed architecture diagram. What do you think?
> 
> 
>    Another angle to think about is readability of the diagram for which it would be good to reduce the number of boxes with text. We could do the same approach with the OpenStack components as I described above and switch to ‘Compute’, ‘Identity’, ‘Block Storage’, etc and drop a few of the currently listed components and indicate it is not a comprehensive list. What would be your preference?
> 
> 
>    Thanks and Best Regards,
>    Ildikó
> 
> 
> 
>    _______________________________________________
>    Starlingx-discuss mailing list
>    Starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io
>    http://lists.starlingx.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/starlingx-discuss
>    _______________________________________________
>    Starlingx-discuss mailing list
>    Starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io
>    http://lists.starlingx.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/starlingx-discuss
> 
> 


_______________________________________________
Starlingx-discuss mailing list
Starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io
http://lists.starlingx.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/starlingx-discuss