[Starlingx-discuss] Reviews for the Docs mega-spec

[Waines, Greg]

<SNIP>
* Overall, if we did all this documentation, which is fairly aggressive in a good way, a lot of it would be valuable upstream. Does it make sense to try to work with openstack docs?

We are already using the standard OpenStack docs tools and processes.  Speaking just for me and not for the Docs team, I think it would make sense to collaborate more with them.

[Greg] yeah not sure I understand your comment Curtis, this is upstream openstack documentation.
Greg.

Ok, say you document multi-region architecture and do a great job at it, so it describes how multi-region works in openstack whether it's stx or not...where does that document live? In stx docs or openstack docs?

Thanks,
Curtis


The STX document would focus on how options/parameters within the STX Installation scripts (e.g. config-controller, config-region, ... and ansible playbook in the future) are used to setup an OpenStack Multi-Region environment with StarlingX ... and would refer to upstream openstack documentation for the description of what OpenStack Multi-Region is in general.

Greg.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.starlingx.io/pipermail/starlingx-discuss/attachments/20190305/3b9600c1/attachment-0001.html>